The expression in radical form is
In order to express the given indices expression in radical form, we need to ensure there is a square root present in the resulting expression.
According to the law of indices,
Given the indices
Comparing with the general formula, we will see that:
m = 3
n = 7
a =
Applying the law of indices:
Hence the expression in radical form is
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/6755932
Answer:
38 : 133 and 16 : 56 are equivalent
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
1) and
2) and
Required
Determine which is equivalent
1) and
Divide by 19
--- can't be further simplified
Divide by 8
Hence:
and
are equivalent
2) and
Divide by 5
Divide by 28
Hence, both are not equivalent.
The last image is the graph of
In fact, it is an increasing exponential function, and it passes through the points , which reflects the fact that
and
, which reflects the fact that
.
Now, is a child of the parent function we just described. Precisely, it is the result of the transformation
In general, every time you perform a transformation like , you translate the graph horizontall, k units to the left if k is positive, and k units to the right if k in negative.
Since in this case , we have a horizontal translation of 4 units to the right.
So, the correct option is the third one, because: