In 1215, a band of rebellious medieval barons forced King John of England to agree to a laundry list of concessions later called the Great Charter, or in Latin, Magna Carta. Centuries later, America’s Founding Fathers took great inspiration from this medieval pact as they forged the nation’s founding documents—including the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
For 18th-century political thinkers like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, Magna Carta was a potent symbol of liberty and the natural rights of man against an oppressive or unjust government. The Founding Fathers’ reverence for Magna Carta had less to do with the actual text of the document, which is mired in medieval law and outdated customs, than what it represented—an ancient pact safeguarding individual liberty.
“For early Americans, Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence were verbal representations of what liberty was and what government should be—protecting people rather than oppressing them,” says John Kaminski, director of the Center for the Study of the American Constitution at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “Much in the same way that for the past 100 years the Statue of Liberty has been a visual representation of freedom, liberty, prosperity and welcoming.”
When the First Continental Congress met in 1774 to draft a Declaration of Rights and Grievances against King George III, they asserted that the rights of the English colonists to life, liberty and property were guaranteed by “the principles of the English constitution,” a.k.a. Magna Carta. On the title page of the 1774 Journal of The Proceedings of The Continental Congress is an image of 12 arms grasping a column on whose base is written “Magna Carta.
The internment of Fred Korematsu was unjustified. Korematsu was one of thousands of Japanese American citizens put into internment camps after the bombing of Pearl Harbor . Korematsu did not commit any crimes nor was he affiliated with the Japanese government at all.
This treatment would not be justified even if he wasn’t a citizen. Unless he committed a crime, his internment / constant surveillance is unjustified.
Answer: It featured two national parties competing for control of the presidency, Congress, and the states: the Federalist Party, created largely by Alexander Hamilton, and the rival Jeffersonian Democratic-Republican Party, formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, usually called at the time the Republican Party
Explanation:
After World War 1, prevalent attitudes in America included one of not supporting the US being involved in foreign affairs. World War 1 started in 194 and ended in 1918. After the First World War, isolationism became prevalent in American society. Another attitude that developed was nativism.
here's the website: www.answers.com/Q/What_attitudes_became_prevalent_in_America_after_World_War_
Answer:
1. To better represent the ideas and wants of the people
Explanation:
The electoral college does not in fact serve this purpose, presidents have been elected even when they held less of the popular vote, for example Donald Trump. Many say it goes against the principles of democracy, that being "to represent the ideas and wants of the people"
