The key point is that the motivation to invade largely Christian and Jewish Spain was based on both the wealth from the initial conquest and the wealth generated by the jizayh tax on the population.
Answer:
D, E
Explanation:
I'm not sure at all, but in the email it was a direct request from the organization and she feels a personal connection considering her backstory, so that explains that.
I'm really not sure if this is right, don't bully me :(
Arabic it the official language in Syria
Answer:
129 mph ≤ S mph
Step-by-step explanation:
S or the current speed won't be lower than 130 so S is greater than 129 at all times
I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
