Question

The 1961 mapp v. ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney. the right to remain silent after an arrest. the use of incriminating statements. the use of illegally obtained evidence.

Answer 1

The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence.

What is illegally obtained evidence?

The term illegally Obtained Evidence is known to be the type of evidence that can be made or gotten that is against the normal way of obtaining evidence.

Note that The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence and this can influence the judgement made.

Learn more about evidence from

brainly.com/question/1256677

#SPJ4