Answer:
The possible answers are:
A
. Yes, because his actions constituted an unlawful operation of the construction equipment.
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
C. No, because at most he could be found guilty of criminal negligence.
D. No, because he must have been aware that his conduct would cause the damage to the trailer in order to be found guilty of reckless damage.
The correct answer is:
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
Explanation:
The worker should be found guilty, since he was aware of being intoxicated from the beginning of the action, knowing in advance that when operating the heavy construction equipment there would be a great threat for the people and properties around. Besides, he was also aware about the alarming signs, due to the fact that he could not reach the dum truck normally, he had to jump the fence to reach it, increasing the risk with his actions.
They are native to South America
The trainer is using the method of successive approximations. In addition, successive approximation is a sequence of rewards that offer positive reinforcement for behavior variations that are successive steps on the way to the final preferred. The theory was first created and used by Skinner, who is recognized for his theories that contain learning behaviors by means of reinforcement. The theory includes reinforcing behavior that is successively closer and closer to the approximations of the anticipated or directed behavior.
Answer:
Lewis and Clark
Explanation:
The Lewis and Clark Expedition began in 1804, when President Thomas Jefferson tasked Meriwether Lewis with exploring lands west of the Mississippi River that comprised the Louisiana Purchase. Lewis chose William Clark as his co-leader for the mission.
