1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
12345 [234]
2 years ago
15

If the United States and Canada enter into a trade deal that allows Canada to trade oil to the U.S. and U.S. to trade auto parts

to Canada, who will benefit and who will be at a disadvantage from this deal?
A. The governments of both countries will benefit. Oil producers in the U.S. and auto part manufacturers in Canada will benefit. Oil producers in Canada and auto part manufacturers in the U.S. will be at a disadvantage.

B. Consumers in both countries will benefit. Oil producers in Canada and auto part manufacturers in the U.S. will benefit. Oil producers in the U.S. and auto part manufacturers in Canada will be at a disadvantage.

C. consumers in both countries will benefit. Oil producers in the U.S. and auto part manufacturers in Canada will benefit. Oil producers in Canada and auto part manufacturers in the U.S. will be at a disadvantage.

D. The governments of both countries will benefit. Oil producers in Canada and auto part manufacturers in the U.S. will benefit. Oil producers in the U.S. and auto part manufacturers in Canada will be at a disadvantage.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Sladkaya [172]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

because the oil producers and auto part manufactures.

You might be interested in
How did the Green Revolution increase population
yulyashka [42]
It is the crops that did that.
7 0
3 years ago
Studies on the "culture of honor" showed that men raised in the south, as compared to men raised in the north, responded to verb
Verizon [17]
<span>Men raised in the south responded to verbally aggressive behavior by using aggression and violence. This 'culture of honor' can usually be reflected in southern states where it is more common and accepted to own firearms, and where it is appropriate to fight someone over a disagreement.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
6. How were tea drinking, calligraphy, and haiku related in 18th Century Japan? Explain
valkas [14]

The tea-drinking, calligraphy, and haiku were related in 18th Century Japan as the Japanese tend to cultivate the habit of expressing the nature of drinking tea through the haiku form of poetry, using calligraphy.

Typically, haiku is a form of poetry whose subject matter is usually about nature. Also, the concept of tea in Japan is that tea comes from nature and its consumption affects human lives.

Similarly, the use of Calligraphy to express haiku poetry in Japan was common in the 18th century, as the Japanese consider calligraphy to be the art of giving form to nature in an expressive, unified, and creative way.

For example, the writing of haiku poetry by a Japanese renowned poet Basho   in calligraphy style read thus:

"drinking morning tea

the monk is peaceful

the chrysanthemum blooms"

Hence, the tea-drinking, calligraphy, and haiku were related in 18th Century Japan as the Japanese tend to cultivate the habit of expressing the nature of drinking tea through the haiku form of poetry, using calligraphy

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24574496

6 0
3 years ago
After the fall of the Roman Empire, which best describes Europe’s political situation?
Anton [14]

Answer:

Much of Western Europe was left without a strong centralized government due to the breakdown of the Roman Empire l. As a result of the invasions, and a weak central government, a new social and political system known as feudalism developed

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Last summer, a five-year-old boy in Seattle was killed by his brother when the two were playing with their father's gun. Last mo
Klio2033 [76]
Yes they are in fact in danger. Not of the gun itself, but the non-responsible parents or guardians that own the firearms. In my and only my opinion, any household that acquires such firearms, should be entitled to teaching their children about gun safety and the dangers if misused properly. My point here is that children are not in danger of the firearms’ itself, the gun can’t shoot by itself, so don’t let your children near them. It’s simple.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How well did feudalism establish order in Europe in the Middle Ages?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did people create new tools?
    8·2 answers
  • Ron is highly skeptical about new ideas and products. He has not yet bought a satellite dish for his home because he is still un
    12·1 answer
  • Scott just got an ATM card to use and must choose a PIN (Personal Identification Number). How should he select a PIN that will g
    11·1 answer
  • Industry leaders believed that Georgia could become a(n) _________ capital of the South. Fill in the blank.
    9·1 answer
  • How did the the crusades affect muslim society?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Acadians come to Louisiana during the 1760s?
    6·2 answers
  • Describe the basic functions of<br>religion<br>and<br>their connections to development.​
    8·1 answer
  • DOCUMENT 2: Justification of Slavery, Bishop Bossuet, French Theologian (1627-1704)
    9·1 answer
  • Protocols within the tcp/ip suite and products supporting tcp/ip networks are conceived as working at four layers. what are thos
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!