Julia is engaged in the stage of the perception process known as interpreting, where she tries to make sense of her experiences and their meaning.
<h3>The interpretation stage</h3>
When it comes to the perception process, the interpretation stage is the moment where we make sense of the world and the experiences we have had in it. This is where we try to see a meaning in what we have lived through.
This is what Julia is doing. She is analyzing her past personal experiences, her involvement with people in the present and even the assumptions she has, all with the purpose of understanding her situation. Julia is interpreting, making sense of her life and situation.
With the information above in mind, we can choose the third answer choice as the correct answer for this question.
The complete question with the missing answer choices is the following:
In an attempt to understand the situation unfolding around her, Julia considered past personal experiences, her involvement with others present, and any assumptions she might have. In doing so, what stage of the perception process was she engaged in?
Learn more about the perception process here:
brainly.com/question/1838569
#SPJ1
**It caused conflicts between religious and ethnic groups**
That is your answer
Good Luck :)
Answer:
the social cognitive perspective
Explanation:
Kaitlin is a personality theorist who believes that a person's conscious thoughts in a particular situation are likely to influence his or her goals and behavior. Kaitlin is most likely to agree with the social cognitive perspective on personality.
Social cognitive perspective is the way we think about others plays a major role in how we think, feel, and interact and relate with the world around us.This basically is like saying the way i see a situation or perceive a situation is the way i would act. Kaitlin believes that a person's conscious thoughts in a particular situation are likely to influence his or her goals and behavior is a social cognitive perspective.
The North realized that if it did not act swiftly, the Southern states might take the precedent of the Scott case as a justification for expanding slavery into new territories and free states alike. The South recognized the threat of the Republican party and knew that the party had gained a considerable amount of support as a result of the Northern paranoia in the aftermath of the decision.
