2 years ago

3.

Mathematics

1 answer:

LiRa [457]2 years ago

4 0

Using translation concepts, it is found that there was a horizontal compression of the function.

<h3>What is a translation?</h3>

A translation is represented by a change in the function graph, according to operations such as multiplication or sum/subtraction in it's definition.

In this problem, there was a multiplication in the domain of the function, by a factor greater than 1, hence there was a horizontal compression of the function.

More can be learned about translation concepts at brainly.com/question/4521517

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Measure to the correct location on the imaige not all angle measures will be used

Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

The answer is less than 90 but greater than 35. because the other angles look as if they are 105 I would say that the answer is 75

5 0

4 years ago

HELP DUE IN 15 MINS! <br> Solve for x in the parallelogram below:<br><br> X=??

malfutka [58]

Answer:

x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Consecutive angles in a parallelogram are supplementary, sum to 180°, so

14x + 6 + 118 = 180

14x + 124 = 180 ( subtract 124 from both sides )

14x = 56 ( divide both sides by 14 )

x = 4

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

17 POINTS!!!! List the elements in the set described. {x|x is a natural number between 9 and 17} (Use a comma to separate answer

stepladder [879]

Answer:

10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Step-by-step explanation:

The natural numbers are 1, 2, 3, 4, ...

The natural numbers between 9 and 17 are 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16.

Answer: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

8 0

3 years ago

How do you write 0.0036 in scientific notation

Diano4ka-milaya [45]

3.6 * 10^(-3) is the scientific notation

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How do you do this problem?? I'm very confused

Mamont248 [21]

You have to multiply by the complex conjugate so that you can clear the radical from the denominator. Once you do the multiplication simplify the radical. There's still a common factor in -54, -18, & 75 so divide all those by 3.

7 0

3 years ago