The detail that is essential to Churchill’s argument that countries should not remain neutral in the war is: A. “French and British Armies might well at the outset have saved not only Belgium but perhaps even Poland” since Churchill stated that the French and British saved Belgium during WW2 after it was attacked.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>B. The author explains the source of tension between rival groups.
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is evident in the article that peace implementation strategies have been one of the difficult decisions to tackle. The lack of momentum and peace agreement meetings threatens transitional government formation. The peacemaking process always faces challenges in the country. However, it was Troika who asked the Sudanese government to come into an agreement to increase their efforts and handle the most pressing issues and create unity by creating agreement on the reforms through the mobilization of support from other parts of Sudan.
Think about what a claim is. a claim is something that you state, even if you don't have proof. choice C is a fact, not a claim--it would be used as evidence to support a claim, but it doesn't serve as a claim itself.
i would say that B is the most appropriate claim to argue that people should be more nutritionally knowledgeable. choice D is almost a counterargument, in a sense, because it lists a flaw with food labels. choice A is a statement, but it can be proven with evidence--one could look at a food label to search for the listed items.
The reasoning of why shouldn’t be completely answered with a time frame