1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zanzabum
1 year ago
13

What does the constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press mean for news people? They can write about unsupported rumors as

if they were factual. They must report the news without favoritism toward any point of view. They can report the news without getting the government’s permission. They must always challenge the government’s positions on major issues.
History
1 answer:
ozzi1 year ago
5 0

The Constitution assures of freedom of the press is the primary amendment of the Bill of Rights. They can report the news without getting the government’s permission.

<h3>What does the Constitution guarantee of freedom of press?</h3>

The Constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press that it has the right to record and document information approximately subjects they sense the general public should pay attention without the government’s permission.

It's essentially a part of our rights as humans residing withinside the US to understand and be knowledgeable via uncensored information.

Thus, the correct statement is the constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press means for news people is that they can report the news without getting the government’s permission.

Learn more about Bill of rights here:

brainly.com/question/2018522

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What is Historiography?
Elenna [48]
I believe the correct answer is B
6 0
2 years ago
Select the four luxury items that were imported from the Orient
poizon [28]

Answer:jewels, orbs, gold, jade

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes a consequence of the reservation system during the 1870s?
suter [353]

The consequence of the reservation system during the 1870s was that the Tribes refused to stay on the failing reservations. Therefore, Option A is the correct statement.

<h3>What was the reservation system?</h3>

The Indian reservation system was mainly created to hold Native Americans off of lands that European Americans wanted to settle. The reservation system allowed indigenous human beings to manipulate themselves and keep a number of their cultural and social traditions.

Therefore, The consequence of the reservation system during the 1870s was that the Tribes refused to stay on the failing reservations. Therefore, Option A is the correct statement.

learn more about reservation system:

brainly.com/question/722207

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
True or False. The U.S utilized Montesquieu's idea of separation of power by creating the 3 branches of government.
Angelina_Jolie [31]

idk the answer but here The name most associated with the doctrine of the separation of powers is that of Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron Montesquieu. His influence upon later thought and upon the development of institutions far outstrips, in this connection, that of any of the earlier writers we have considered. It is clear, however, that Montesquieu did not invent the doctrine of the separation of powers, and that much of what he had to say in Book XI, Chapter 6 of the De l’Esprit des Loix was taken over from contemporary English writers, and from John Locke.1 Montesquieu, it is true, contributed new ideas to the doctrine; he emphasized certain elements in it that had not previously received such attention, particularly in relation to the judiciary, and he accorded the doctrine a more important position than did most previous writers. However, the influence of Montesquieu cannot be ascribed to his originality in this respect, but rather to the manner and timing of the doctrine’s development in his hands.

Long before the publication of De l’Esprit des Loix Montesquieu had become widely known and respected through the publication of the Lettres persanes and the Considérations sur les causes de la grandeur des Romains. The appearance of his great work was awaited with impatience, and, once published, it quickly ran through several editions. When the work appeared it was clearly not a piece of transient political propaganda, as had been many of the writings we have so far surveyed—it was the result of twenty years of preparation, and was intended as a scientific study of government, encompassing the whole length and breadth of history, and accounting for all the factors affecting the political life of man. Montesquieu, in his Preface, made it clear what the work contained:2 “I have laid down the first principles, and have found that the particular cases follow naturally from them; that the histories of all nations are only consequences of them; and that every particular law is connected with another law, or depends on some other of a more general extent.” These principles are not drawn from the writer’s prejudices, but “from the nature of things.” Montesquieu intends to show the way in which the laws of each State are related to the nature and principles of its form of government, to the climate, soil, and economy of the country, and to its manners and customs.3 Such a scientific approach rules out the expression of personal likes and dislikes: “Every nation will here find the reasons on which its maxims are founded.” No absolute solutions are proposed, only the necessary relationships between the form of government and the laws are exposed. This claim to scientific detachment gives to Montesquieu’s work a status that no political pamphleteer could claim. The doctrine of the separation of powers is embedded in this examination of cause and effect in the political system. It is no longer an isolated doctrine, taken up when political advantage makes it expedient, and put off when no longer needed; it is part of the relationships of a particular type of legal system; and furthermore, it is a necessary characteristic of that system which has political liberty as its direct aim. De l’Esprit des Loix was hailed as the first systematic treatise on politics since Aristotle; not a desiccated, boring treatise for the expert alone, but rather as a work the brilliant style of which made it an object of attention for all educated men. Indeed, Voltaire caustically remarked that it was Montesquieu’s style alone which retrieved a work so full of error.

                 <u><em>PLS GIVE ME BRAINLIEST THIS WAS VERY HARD </em></u>

3 0
3 years ago
There are five levels of mental illness
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

i would say its true

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how phoenicia economically survived
    10·1 answer
  • What was the original primary use of drilled oil ?
    14·1 answer
  • Which imperial power had the most colonies spread out across the world in 1900?
    7·1 answer
  • The U.S. was happy to have Alaska when it discovered lots of _______.A. ivoryB. ironC. oilD. silver
    11·2 answers
  • According to the lesson, how did medieval society view women? as warriors as damsels in need of protection as made for religious
    9·2 answers
  • How was the American system expected to unite the nation's economic interests?
    11·1 answer
  • Describe why the Incan Empire became harder to manage as it grew
    6·1 answer
  • What were Quakers noted for?
    8·2 answers
  • PLS HELP 100 POINTS!!
    5·1 answer
  • How does the scale of the First World War compare to that of the Second World War,
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!