Let $x be the amount of money which Kelci has raised. <span>Brianna has raised 3 times more money than kelci, then she has raised $3x. Totally both have aised $(x+3x)=$4x.
</span>
Since <span>together they have raised more than $300, then 4x>300,
</span>

.
Answer: the <span>inequality </span><span><span>

</span>can be used to determine the amount of money kelci has raised</span>
Answer:
Step 2 contains error in the given problem.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given expression is:

Step 1: identifying the LCM.
The LCM identified is 6.
This step is correct.
In the next step, we multiply the LCM with each term of the equation.
Step 2:

However,
In the given solution, the LCM is not multiplied with each term.
Hence,
Step 2 contains error in the given problem.
A.) R(20) = -10(20)^2 + 800(20) = -10(400) + 16000 = -4000 + 16000 = $12,000
R(25) = -10(25)^2 + 800(25) = -10(625) + 20000 = -6250 + 20000 = $13,750
R(30) = -10(30)^2 + 800(30) = -10(900) + 24000 = -9000 + 24000 = $15,000
b.) For maximum revenue, dR/dp = 0
dR/dp = -20p + 800 = 0
20p = 800
p = 40
Therefore, the maximum revenue will be recorded when the price is set at $40.
Answer:
The estimate of In(1.4) is the first five non-zero terms.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
We are to find the estimate of In(1 . 4) within 0.001 by applying the function of the Maclaurin series for f(x) = In (1 + x)
So, by the application of Maclurin Series which can be expressed as:

Let examine f(x) = In(1+x), then find its derivatives;
f(x) = In(1+x)

f'(0) 
f ' ' (x) 
f ' ' (x) 
f ' ' '(x) 
f ' ' '(x) 
f ' ' ' '(x) 
f ' ' ' '(x) 
f ' ' ' ' ' (x) 
f ' ' ' ' ' (x) 
Now, the next process is to substitute the above values back into equation (1)



To estimate the value of In(1.4), let's replace x with 0.4


Therefore, from the above calculations, we will realize that the value of
as well as
which are less than 0.001
Hence, the estimate of In(1.4) to the term is
is said to be enough to justify our claim.
∴
The estimate of In(1.4) is the first five non-zero terms.