In document 2, the lack of evidence on Mexico's actions and the text aimed at the Mexican public affects the reliability of the document.
<h3>Why is reliability affected?</h3>
- Document 2 is written by a Mexican who only valued US stocks.
- The author wants to talk to a Mexican public and stimulate a feeling of revenge against the USA.
- For this reason, the author only addresses the negative actions provoked by the USA and how this has affected Mexico.
The author ignores Mexico's negative actions, placing the country as innocent in the approaching conflict.
More information about research sources at the link:
brainly.com/question/26044896
Answer:
nationalism is the place where u are from. sometimes it could be from where youre parents are from. for example my parents are from cuba so that makes my nationalism cuban because of them.
Explanation:
<span>Based on the global stratification model, nations of the former soviet union and its former satellites in eastern Europe are classified as the Industrializing nations.
They are definitely not Third World countries - those are the poorest nations in the world, most of which are found in Africa. They are also not the least industrializing nations, because they are quite industrialized, but not as much as the most industrializing nations either.
</span>
I believe the best option would be A because both compromises aimed to appease the growing friction between the north and south.
Maine admitted as free state and Missouri a slave state, preserved sectional balance of senate, Louisiana territory split b/w slaveholders and free settlers, south=slavery was legal, north= slavery banned (except Missouri), slavery in federal territories settled, slavery legal south of dividing line, Maine and Missouri= free states, settle slave issue temporarily
