I wrote an essay on this. I said that the human rights issues in this book was lack of education and health care, and unfair pay. Lennie seemed to be lacking academically and there were cases where Lennie was hurt but was not taken care of while Curly was hurt but did get medical help. Also the pay is unfair because there is a very clear difference between the well-being of the workers vs the owners of the ranch.
Hope this helped, good luck! :D
Answer Expert Verified. I believe the correct answer is Zaroff has no conscience, while Rainsford does have a conscience. As you can see in the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering other people, which he considers to be just a type of hunting.
Explanation:
Hello. You did not inform the article to which this text refers, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
To support the idea that a storm was the worst sight in all of America, the author must present information to support this argument. Therefore, the author must have shown meteorological data that show the intensity of the storm and compare it with other storms. In addition, the author must show the destructive power of the storm, presenting the damage it caused to the American population.
It is really a great story so far. What you need to do next is to write what did Ryker and Noelle do when they heard the footsteps above them. Did they investigate or did they leave the house? Since Ryker had already told Noelle that his brother was going to try and murder her, I don't think you should send them directly upstairs to see what or who made the footsteps. You should let the story continue a little more to be more dramatic. Don't let the story be a cliche like others would do. Perhaps, they could hide and wait to see who comes down. They could also catch the brother and then call the police or even the parents. You want the story to be different and have more excite to make the reader be wowed in the end.
