All categories

2 years ago

A person who learns french and english simultaneously from childhood onward would be considered bilingual?

1 answer:

5 0

Compound bilingualism is employed to determine a person that examines French and English simultaneously from childhood onwards.

<h3>What is Compound bilingual?</h3>

The term “compound bilingual” is used to define somebody that learns two languages in the same discourse, resulting in one concept with two linguistic expressions.

A person that studies French and English simultaneously from childhood onwards is said to be compound bilingual.

Therefore, Compound bilingualism is used to denote a person that learns two languages.

To learn more about the Compound bilingual, refer to:

brainly.com/question/20110324

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

What challenges do we face today in regards to Georgia water sources?

murzikaleks [220]

Answer:The way we see it, Atlanta's primary challenges and opportunities are:

Water sharing & governance.

Access to safe, affordable water.

Building all infrastructure as water infrastructure.

Multi-benefit infrastructure without displacem

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

What does the term in media res mean and how does it function in The Odyssey

aksik [14]

The term 'In medias res' is a Latin phrase which means 'In the middle of things or events'.

Explanation:

The term 'In medias res' is a Latin phrase which means 'In the middle of things or events'.

In Homer's epic, Odyssey, he begins with the phrase In medias res. The story thus begins with the wanderings of Odysseus and then goes on with the Trojan War. Knowing the journey of Odysseus, it creates interest in the reader. The story becomes enjoyable by the narration of Odysseus's journey rather than beginning with the winning of the Trojan war.

6 0

3 years ago

Modernity has largely led to the collapse of strong marital ties and subsequently affected the choice of mates. Critically provi

DIA [1.3K]

Answer is given below

Explanation:

Different people define it in different ways. Sociologists cannot accept the same meaning. For our purposes, we have defined marriage as a legally recognized social contract between two persons, which is traditionally based on sexual intercourse and affects the permanence of the union.
In formulating a comprehensive definition, we must also consider variations such as whether a formal legal union is necessary (think of a common law marriage and its equivalents), or whether more than two people can participate.
Other changes in the definition of marriage include whether spouses are of the opposite sex or of the same sex, and how one of the traditional expectations of marriage (having children) can be understood today. Based on Simel's distinction between social and contact forms and content (see Chapter 6), we can analyze the family as a social form that exists within five different materials or interests in sexual activity, economic cooperation, reproduction, child socialization, and emotion.
As we expect from Simmel's analysis, some or all of these substances are expressed in a variety of family types: nuclear families, polygamous families, extended families, same-parent families, single-parent families, zero-child families, etc., however, coincidentally in the form of family adoption it will not be; Instead, these forms are determined by cultural traditions, social structures, economic pressures, and historical changes.
They are subject to intense moral and political debate about the definition of family, "family decline" or policy options that best serve the well-being of children. In these discussions, sociology demonstrates its practical side as a discipline that can provide the real knowledge needed to make evidence-based decisions on political and moral issues related to the family.
Sociologists are interested in the relationship between the marriage organization and the family organization, because, historically, marriages form a family, and society-built families are the most basic social unit. Both marriage and family play an acceptable status role in society.

4 0

3 years ago

How are laws today different from the Code of Hammurabi?

natali 33 [55]

Answer: they are different bc -Inscribed on a seven-foot stele (stone slab or pillar), enshrined in the temple of Marduk (national god of the Babylonians)

-The Code is now considered a summary of a body of long-standing Sumerian laws

-Laws about prices, wages, payment of loans, marriage contracts, property, slaves

hope this helps..... sorry if u get it wrong

3 0

3 years ago

_____ validity is the extent to which findings may be generalized, while _____ validity refers to the ability to infer that ther

Vladimir [108]

<u>External</u> validity is the extent to which findings may be generalized, while <u>internal </u>validity refers to the ability to infer that there is a causal relationship between variables.

Internal validity is the degree to which the observed effect can be reliably attributed to the independent variable. Internal validity is attained if only the independent variable(s) are responsible for the dependent variable's effect. This is the level of manipulation that can be applied to a result. In other words, internal validity is a measure of how well your research "works" in a research environment. Does the variable you alter inside a particular study have an impact on the variable you're examining?

The term "external validity" describes how far a study's findings can be extrapolated from the sample. Which means you may use the information you learn to make adjustments for different scenarios and people. Consider this as the extent to which a result can be generalized. How well do the research findings translate to the rest of the world? A controlled environment with fewer variables is a laboratory setting (or other research setting). The term "external validity" describes how well the findings stand up in the presence of all those other variables.

To learn more about relationship between variables here,

brainly.com/question/14086146

#SPJ4

3 0

2 years ago