Answer:
hopefully this helps i have a summarizing thing that does it for me,
The world’s population could swell to 10.9 billion by the end of the century, a new United Nations analysis found, raising concerns that adding more than 3 billion people to the planet could further deplete natural resources and accelerate global warming. The increase, up from the current count of 7.7 billion people, is expected despite a continued decline in the global fertility rate, which has fallen from 3.2 births per woman in 1990 to 2.5 births per woman this year. Experts say the global fertility rate will continue to decline, but the world’s overall population will still rise, hitting 9.7 billion by 2050. The new report predicts slower population growth than the U.N.’s last assessment, released in 2017. That estimate projected that the world population would reach a staggering 11.2 billion by the end of the century. The revised figures reflect the downward trend in the global fertility rate, which means the populations of more countries are shrinking.The fastest growth, according to the new report, is most likely to occur in sub-Saharan Africa, which is expected to double its population in the next 30 years.
Explanation:
During 1787 different delegates of the government joined forces at the Independence Hall, to reach to a historical agreement. Named after Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, the Connecticut Compromise stated that the United States was going to have a dual system of representation in the Congress.
This is to say that in the Senate, all the states were going to have the same number of representatives. Meanwhile in the House of Representatives each state would have a different amount of members, depending on the size of its own population.
Answer: The cultivation effect.
Explanation:
The cultivation effect theory as proposed by George Gerbner explains how the role of the media can influence people's perception of the world over long exposure.According to this theory, people who constantly watch television are more susceptible to be influenced by media messages and which in no time aligns with their thoughts and how they view the world around them.
Therefore for example in the question, If someone constantly watches a lot of violent and crime movies eg law and order, his or her perception of the environment will change regardless of living in an area void of violent crime rates.
Hi there!
The principle of SOCIAL CONFORMITY.
It showed that people tend to engage behaviours more likely in confirmation of the society at large.
The interesting question is when everybody is thinking about confirming then who decide what behavior to engage in, from the start? That is if we are supposed to DRINK in a Social gathering when all are drinking. Then who thought that Drinking is to be done by all, or who sets the social norm and how is the degree of strictness understood and enforced?
is it something we just think and that the norms doesn't actually exist?
Some food for thought!
hope it make sense!
