1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina CMI [18]
1 year ago
12

Sue and Tim are arguing about the value of appointing rather than electing federal judges. Tim says they are appointed because t

hey need to be independent. What does he mean?. . Judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of law. . Judges receive their commissions from the president so they are independent in the sense that only the president needs to approve their decisions, not other officials.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Afina-wow [57]1 year ago
8 0

Federal judges are appointed rather than elected because they will make decisions based on what they think is right according to the law, rather than on what they think will help them keep their job.

<h3>How Federal Judges are appointed?</h3>

Judges of the Supreme Court, judges of the appellate court, and judges of district courts are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate of the United States, as provided for in the Constitution.

The independence of the judiciary, the power of the courts, and the judiciary to perform their functions without the influence or control of other actors, whether public or private.

Thus, The term independence of the judiciary is also used in a general sense to refer to the kind of independence that courts and judges should have.

Learn more about Federal judges here:

brainly.com/question/1333907

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
When his team wins a basketball game, joe says it is because his team is so good; however, when his team loses, he says it is be
Goshia [24]

The actions of Joe in protesting that the referees made unfair calls is an example of self-serving bias because he believes his team is superior.

<h3>What is Joe demonstrating?</h3>

Joe in this scenario, is demonstrating a self-serving bias because he believes that his team is better than the other team.

This has led to him questioning the actions of others involved in the game such as the referees, because he can't fathom the possibility that his team, and himself, were not good enough that day.

Find out more on self-serving bias at brainly.com/question/1325291.

3 0
2 years ago
Where was the first Spanish settlement in Texas?​
kobusy [5.1K]

Answer:

Is this multiple choice? if not then it's present day San Antonio

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who are Greece’s 3 Orthodox Friends? Why?
REY [17]

The Greece’s 3 Orthodox Friends are:

  • Eastern Orthodoxy
  • Catholicism, Anglicanism
  • Christian churches.

<h3>Who founded Greek Orthodox?</h3>

The ancient Christian Greek Orthodox Church were been documented to be the one that brought about the founding  through  Jesus Christ and his apostles.

In this case, it should be noted that it described in the Book of Acts in the Bible, as regards the unbroken historical existence, hence Greece’s 3 Orthodox Friends are:

  • Eastern Orthodoxy
  • Catholicism, Anglicanism
  • Christian churches.

Learn more about Greece’s Orthodox at:

brainly.com/question/14329349

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Using complete sentences, compare and contrast ancient Greek and Roman ideas about government and citizenship.
svetlana [45]

Answer:

<em>Ancient Greek and Roman societies granted their citizens rights and responsibilities that slaves, foreigners, and other people who were considered subordinate did not possess. In Greece, citizenship meant sharing in the duties and privileges of membership in the polis, or city-state. </em>

hope this helped

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Richard neustadt has argued that presidential power is the power to
AVprozaik [17]

Key Point: "Presidential power is the power to persuade." (11) Presidents are expected to do much more than their authority allows them to do. Persuasion and bargaining are the means that presidents use to influence policy. Not only do presidents need to bargain to influence other branches of government (particularly Congress), but presidents also must bargain to influence the executive branch itself; cabinet secretaries, agency heads, and individual bureaucrats all have leverage that they can use against the president, requiring presidents to persuade even the executive branch, not merely command it.

Neustadt's conclusion is a good summary:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Terry has a collection of 5 cd's.He order 2 new cds per week to add to his collection.
    6·1 answer
  • Why are minutes and seconds important to finding the absolute location of a place?
    13·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3Cmarquee%3ETELL" id="TexFormula1" title="TELL" alt="TELL" align="absmiddle" class="latex-for
    15·2 answers
  • How would geography be useful in helping to plan the future of a community?
    15·1 answer
  • How does the warm water of the Gulf Stream along the coast of North America affect temperatures in the United Kingdom
    15·1 answer
  • What are some key drawbacks to utilitarian thinking about the corporate level?
    11·1 answer
  • The study of perception is primarily concerned with how we:
    10·1 answer
  • Gregor Mendel formulated a principle based on his experiments, which demonstrated that each of the two particles (genes) is equa
    11·1 answer
  • What is a OT therapist
    12·1 answer
  • List one benefit of having an article from a database mailed to yourself​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!