Question

Sue and Tim are arguing about the value of appointing rather than electing federal judges. Tim says they are appointed because they need to be independent. What does he mean?. . Judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of law. . Judges receive their commissions from the president so they are independent in the sense that only the president needs to approve their decisions, not other officials.

Answer 1

Federal judges are appointed rather than elected because they will make decisions based on what they think is right according to the law, rather than on what they think will help them keep their job.

How Federal Judges are appointed?

Judges of the Supreme Court, judges of the appellate court, and judges of district courts are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate of the United States, as provided for in the Constitution.

The independence of the judiciary, the power of the courts, and the judiciary to perform their functions without the influence or control of other actors, whether public or private.

Thus, The term independence of the judiciary is also used in a general sense to refer to the kind of independence that courts and judges should have.

Learn more about Federal judges here:

brainly.com/question/1333907

#SPJ1