From what I gather from your latest comments, the PDF is given to be

and in particular, <em>f(x, y)</em> = <em>cxy</em> over the unit square [0, 1]², meaning for 0 ≤ <em>x</em> ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ <em>y</em> ≤ 1. (As opposed to the unbounded domain, <em>x</em> ≤ 0 *and* <em>y</em> ≤ 1.)
(a) Find <em>c</em> such that <em>f</em> is a proper density function. This would require

(b) Get the marginal density of <em>X</em> by integrating the joint density with respect to <em>y</em> :

(c) Get the marginal density of <em>Y</em> by integrating with respect to <em>x</em> instead:

(d) The conditional distribution of <em>X</em> given <em>Y</em> can obtained by dividing the joint density by the marginal density of <em>Y</em> (which follows directly from the definition of conditional probability):

(e) From the definition of expectation:
![E[X]=\displaystyle\int_0^1\int_0^1 x\,f_{X,Y}(x,y)\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy=4\left(\int_0^1x^2\,\mathrm dx\right)\left(\int_0^1y\,\mathrm dy\right)=\boxed{\frac23}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BX%5D%3D%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cint_0%5E1%5Cint_0%5E1%20x%5C%2Cf_%7BX%2CY%7D%28x%2Cy%29%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dx%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dy%3D4%5Cleft%28%5Cint_0%5E1x%5E2%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dx%5Cright%29%5Cleft%28%5Cint_0%5E1y%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dy%5Cright%29%3D%5Cboxed%7B%5Cfrac23%7D)
![E[Y]=\displaystyle\int_0^1\int_0^1 y\,f_{X,Y}(x,y)\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy=4\left(\int_0^1x\,\mathrm dx\right)\left(\int_0^1y^2\,\mathrm dy\right)=\boxed{\frac23}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BY%5D%3D%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cint_0%5E1%5Cint_0%5E1%20y%5C%2Cf_%7BX%2CY%7D%28x%2Cy%29%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dx%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dy%3D4%5Cleft%28%5Cint_0%5E1x%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dx%5Cright%29%5Cleft%28%5Cint_0%5E1y%5E2%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dy%5Cright%29%3D%5Cboxed%7B%5Cfrac23%7D)
![E[XY]=\displaystyle\int_0^1\int_0^1xy\,f_{X,Y}(x,y)\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy=4\left(\int_0^1x^2\,\mathrm dx\right)\left(\int_0^1y^2\,\mathrm dy\right)=\boxed{\frac49}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BXY%5D%3D%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cint_0%5E1%5Cint_0%5E1xy%5C%2Cf_%7BX%2CY%7D%28x%2Cy%29%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dx%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dy%3D4%5Cleft%28%5Cint_0%5E1x%5E2%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dx%5Cright%29%5Cleft%28%5Cint_0%5E1y%5E2%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dy%5Cright%29%3D%5Cboxed%7B%5Cfrac49%7D)
(f) Note that the density of <em>X</em> | <em>Y</em> in part (d) identical to the marginal density of <em>X</em> found in (b), so yes, <em>X</em> and <em>Y</em> are indeed independent.
The result in (e) agrees with this conclusion, since E[<em>XY</em>] = E[<em>X</em>] E[<em>Y</em>] (but keep in mind that this is a property of independent random variables; equality alone does not imply independence.)
I can you be a little bit clear I don’t really understand the question.
Answer:
Electromagnetic waves have crests and troughs similar to those of ocean waves. The distance between crests is the wavelength. The shortest wavelengths are just fractions of the size of an atom, while the longest wavelengths scientists currently study can be larger than the diameter of our planet!
Step-by-step explanation:
222 student tickets
111 adult tickets
That checks out...
2x + x = 333
3x=333
x=111