1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nekit [7.7K]
2 years ago
10

What is a two-house legislature called?

Law
2 answers:
solong [7]2 years ago
5 0
Its A, bicameral hope it help!!
Margaret [11]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A. bicameral

Explanation:

K12 verified

You might be interested in
Which is an example of Quid Pro Quo?
Phantasy [73]

An example of Quid Pro Quo is your manager threatens to get you fired if you

withhold sexual favors

<h3>What is Quid Pro Quo?</h3>

This is a favor someone enjoyed became he or she had been good to the person.

It can be called a compensation for doing goods at a time.

Therefore, An example of Quid Pro Quo is your manager threatens to get you fired if you

withhold sexual favors

Learn more on favor below

brainly.com/question/543079

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
5. What steps should one take in order to successfully transition to a new career path?
stiv31 [10]

Step 1: Explore the options available

Before taking any steps, you should first look around. And make sure you explore the wide range of categories (remote work, tech jobs, finance jobs) to understand the nuances of specific positions. Vincenzo Repasi, a senior coach at LOVR Atlantic who helps his clients with career transitions, emphasizes that finding a new niche is the first vital step when you are preparing for a career change, but don't forget to mention that this step should be approached wisely.

"A lot of the advice says you should follow your dreams, and sometimes that's a really good idea," says Repasi. “However, often this approach complicates retirement and turns your passion into a poorly paid routine.” Instead, Repasi's advice is to do as Ramanathan did, focusing on identifying the opportunities available and your interests in which you have expertise and a competitive advantage.

Step 2: Determine what, who and why

Sarah Johnston, who is a job search strategist and founder of Briefcase Coash, recommends that people who want to change their careers be very specific about their next steps. there is no clear understanding of their next steps, or that they are too open - very often I hear phrases: 'I want to do X, X and X', ”says Johnston. “Job seekers who know what they are looking for (position, opportunities, and so on), who search for those opportunities (definition of the company or specific hiring managers), and know why they are uniquely qualified for those opportunities are significantly more likely to complete their search with success.

Step 3: Conduct Informational Interviews Before Interviewing

Another way to gain insight into whether a particular career is right for you, beyond volunteer work and trial runs, is to talk to professionals who are already working in the field that interests you.

“Get them coffee and ask them about their jobs, their responsibilities, what they enjoy and what they struggle with in their position,” says Vincenzo Repasi, Senior Coach at LOVR Atlantic. "If you're not impressed with that prospect, then you shouldn't go any further."

Amanda Holdsworth, founder of Courses for Communicators, has a lot of informational interviewing experience, having experienced a career transition herself in an industry where she now helps others do the same.

“I worked as a full-time director of communications, making six figures, and then I went to work as an assistant professor (earning half of the previous amount,” she said. “Then I worked as a consultant, career coach and online entrepreneur.” The reason for such a big change was that, despite a good salary, she felt "burnt out" as director of communications. "I left the house at 7 am and did not return there until 6:15 pm or even late at night," Holdsworth said. "I forgot about her girlish affairs and experienced constant stress.

But after becoming an assistant professor, the university where she worked unexpectedly cut a number of professorships - including her position. This gave her the impetus to move fully into consulting and entrepreneurship, where she would have more control over her livelihood.

Holdsworth believes that once you've found a career path that interests you, informational interviews are a great way to get an inside look at positions and what kind of candidates are landing (and they can also help you land a job).

She recommends adding the following two questions to the list of questions above:

If you were looking for a person for this position today, what would the candidate be like?

What skills does a candidate need to get this job?

Johnston agrees with this idea. “Job seekers who invest effort into informational interviews during the transition – and I'm not talking about just one interview – are more likely to get the job they want than job seekers who only apply online,” she said. “I myself have seen informational interviews open completely unexpected doors for my clients.”

<em>I hope this helps you)</em>

6 0
1 year ago
Give ONE reason for your answer
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

a small car

, an automatic car

, an eco-friendly car

, luxury cars

, or minivans and truck

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How does having three branches of government make our lawmaking process more fair? Make sure to use the phrase “checks and balan
Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. This way, no one branch becomes too powerful. Each branch “checks” the power of the other branches to make sure that the power is balanced between them.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What is one thing the Federal Government system can do to ease Mass Incarceration?
Trava [24]

Answer:

*Eliminate prison for lower-level crimes

Explanation: Prison is often the default criminal justice sanction when someone breaks the law. It shouldn’t be that way. For those who commit a lower-level crime like drug possession, petty theft, or selling marijuana, prison is not just unfair, it is also a bad sanction for society at large.Prison costs $31,000 a year per prisoner, and often does little to prevent re-offense for these crimes. Probation, treatment, or community service are all more appropriate for many lower-level crimes, not to mention much cheaper (probation is 10 times less expensive). State legislatures and Congress should change sentencing laws to make alternatives to prison the default penalty for certain lower-level crimes, like drug possession and petty theft.

*Reduce sentence minimums and maximums currently on the books

Explanation: If someone commits a serious crime, like robbery, they should be punished. But there’s little evidence that staying in prison for such long periods of time, such as the 20 or 30-year sentences imposed, will rehabilitate prisoners. In fact, research indicates that longer stays in prison do not lead to lower recidivism. Sometimes, longer stays can even increase recidivism. With prison stays growing longer each year, lawmakers should consider reducing the time many inmates spend behind bars when it’s not necessary. State and federal legislatures should reduce the minimum and maximum sentencing guidelines, and make them more proportional to the crimes committed. We suggest in the report that legislators consider a 25 percent cut as a starting point for the six major crimes (aggravated assault, drug trafficking, murder, non-violent weapons offenses, robbery and serious burglary) that make up the bulk of the nation’s current prison population. This will make our system smarter while still protecting public safety.

*Prosecutors should seek lower penalties when appropriate

Explanation: Prosecutors should use their discretion to implement the recommendations in our report. Their sentencing recommendations should not simply aim to put defendants behind bars for the longest time possible. The best way to keep us all safe is for prosecutors to seek the most proportional punishment – one that fits the crime — not simply the harshest one.

*Eliminate “Three Strikes Laws” and “Truth in Sentencing”

Explanation: Both policies take away the ability of judges to properly asses the appropriate sentence for defendants in the criminal justice system. We should trust our judges to make these decisions instead of forcing an inappropriate sentence with set-in-stone rules.

*Reinvest savings into crime prevention polices

Explanation: The recommendations in the recent Brennan Center report would save almost $20 billion dollars a year. We should reinvest those savings into police, schools, and reentry programs, which will help improve public safety even more. $20 billion could cover 270,000 police officers, 327,000 teachers, or 360,000 probation officers. Most experts agree that these investments better prevent crime than prison.

^^ here are a few :)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The only U.S. state call its political subdivisions "parishes"is????
    7·2 answers
  • Question #22
    15·2 answers
  • Differentiate between patronage and the merit system.​
    9·1 answer
  • What are Fintech laws about​
    11·1 answer
  • What is the role of private security within the criminal justice system
    15·2 answers
  • What is the best lie in the world?<br>​
    11·2 answers
  • Explain in detail how lobbyists impact the laws that are written.
    5·2 answers
  • I'm doing an assignment and i need help.
    10·1 answer
  • Who has the power in the united states to declare war?.
    5·1 answer
  • Person's motor skills are
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!