Answer:
A. Stated in broad terms to allow for flexibility
Explanation:
During the briefing, incident objectives will be presented to all the person involved as the main goal of the operation.
Flexibility<em><u> is allowed in finding methods /ways to achieve</u></em> the goals , BUT <u><em>flexibility cannot be allowed in determining the goal itself. \</em></u>
<em> </em>Stating the objectives in broad terms to allow flexibility only create the risk of confusion, which make team members have different ideas of what needed to be achieved.
To ensure that all the team members work harmoniously, objectives need to be Logically attainable, can be measured by a specific standard, include time frame that specify when the objectives needed to be done, and it also need to stay within the commander's jurisdiction.
Occur if not for the bomb, taking more lives than the bomb would.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question, but anyway, here is the answer. If a company <span>claims that its products are better quality than other similar products, the type of competition presented in this scenario is Nonprice competition. Hope this helps.</span>
<span>New England merchants and Southern planters</span>
