Answer:
The answers are options A and D
Explanation:
Umayyad line, likewise spelled Omayyad, the principal extraordinary Muslim administration to control the realm of the caliphate (661– 750 ce), in some cases alluded to as the Arab kingdom reflecting conventional Muslim objection to the common idea of the Umayyad state.The Umayyads were the primary Muslim line that is, they were the main leaders of the Islamic Empire to go down power inside their family. Under their standard, which endured from 661 to 750 AD, the early Islamic people group was changed into the most great realm of the day.Although this line bound to defeat after a centaury however the elements behind its ruin was available at the season of its start and governmental issues of the adjust caliphs and their debasement expanded it.The family settled dynastic, innate principle with Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan, long-lasting legislative leader of Syria, who turned into the fifth Caliph after the finish of the First Muslim Civil War in 661.
Answer:
marks a major social, economic, or political shift.
Explanation:
marks the beginning of a distinct historical period.
America is a common law system, so you build cases and decisions by building the rationale for decisions on the arguments of Judges before you through the use of precedent.
So, Scalia and Stevens and others would want an argument to be based on the framers or previous decisions to show how established the idea is in American jurisprudence.
People’s natural rights are “inalienable” means that natural rights there - in theory - is no authority who can revoke those rights because we have those rights not because of some actions or merits, but because we are humans, and it is our belonging to the human race what justify those rights. So, because those rights are bound to us because of our humanity, no one could take those back.
I think it is c I’m not sure
Hope that helps
