Answer:
16%
Explanation:
Calculation for the margin that Auagaa474 needed to earn in order to achieve an ROI of 27.2%
First step is to calculate the Turnover using this formula
Turnover = Sales ÷ Average operating assets
Let plug in the formula
Turnover= $491,300 ÷$289,000
Turnover=1.7
Now let calculate the margin using this formula
ROI = Margin × Turnover
Let plug in the formula
27.2% = Margin × 1.7
Margin = 27.2% ÷ 1.70
Margin=0.16*100
Margin= 16%
Therefore the margin that Auagaa474 needed to earn in order to achieve an ROI of 27.2% will be 16%
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
Explanation highest paying
:
Answer: Stimulus generalization.
Explanation:
Ira is making purchase of Damien soaps based on the Stimulus generalization that the soap would perform in the same way as what she has in mind. Stimulus generalization is when an individual reacts to similar stimuli in similar ways.
Answer: Winona has the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the opportunity cost will be calculated as:
= Earnings per hour × Hours taken to complete the task
Therefore, for Winona, the opportunity cost will be:
= 1 × $200.
= $200.
For Hubert, the opportunity cost will be:
= 9 × $25
= $225
Therefore, based on the calculation above, Winona has the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task.
