<span>Confucius thought all men were basically good, Confucianism believed that family came first, children should honor their parents. If the family was happy, the people would be happy and consequently, the king would find it easy to rule with a gentle hand. Confucianism also believed in a hierarchical society, that everyone had a place and a job. There is very few opportunity to deviate from that order. If you family was a farmer, his son also was a farmer, a soldier's son also a soldier, a statesman's son becames statesman.
Han Fei Tzi was a Legalist. In Legalism people were thought to be bad in nature. They needed laws and regulations with stiff punishments to keep them in line. It was a harsh system, very Macachiavellian in nature. It promoted the better skilled person over less skilled people. It's a dog eat dog society, if you don't eat you'll be eaten. Upward mobility was possible but at a cost of loosing the polite and courteous society which Confucianism provided.
In the end, China used Confucianism to pacify the people but kept the legalistic regulations which govern the country.</span>
Answer:
Explanation: Before we tackle this question we must look at a bit of background information. There are two economic schools of thought
-Keynesian
-Supplyside
- In keynesian economics, the government believes that in order to increase the supply, Congress must invest in the society, therefore increasing the deficit.
- <em>In supply side economics, the govt believes the only way to stimulate the economy is through de-regulation, so the govt would actually generate less revenue</em>
<em>- During times of depression keynesian economics are often seemed to be most effective.</em>
Answer:
<em>I believe it was to break up the idian tribes.</em>
Explanation:
They didnt want the tribes to be together.
Answer:
Great Britain
Explanation:
They were pounded over and over again but they never surrendered cuz they legit had an empire on their side and india and the other colonies to carry them to the vic royale
