"Your imagination, your initiative, and your indignation will determine whether we build a society where progress is the servant
of our needs, or a society where old values and new visions are buried under unbridled growth. For in your time we have the
opportunity to move not only toward the rich society and the powerful society, but upward to the Great Society. The Great Society
rests on abundance and liberty for all. It demands an end to poverty and racial injustice, to which we are totally committed in our
time. But that is just the beginning. The Great Society is a place where every child can find knowledge to enrich his mind and to
enlarge his talents. It is a place where leisure is a welcome chance to build and reflect, not a feared cause of boredom and
restlessness. It is a place where the city of man serves not only the needs of the body and the demands of commerce but the
desire for beauty and the hunger for community."
- Presidential remarks at the University of Michigan, May 22, 1964
What was the MAIN reason some political lef-wing groups during the 1960s criticized the application of Great Society
programs?
a
b
ОООО
The Great Society ideals would require large financial investments on many levels.
They feared the government would become too powerful under the Great Society plan,
They believed moral and cultural traditions would decline under the Great Society plan,
The Great Society ideals seemed inconsistent with the escalating war in Vietnam
C
d
The Great Society ideals seemed inconsistent with the escalating war in Vietnam
Explanation: Political Leaders on the left are primarily Doves (Anti-War/Pro-Peace) so, if you are esclating a war in Vietnam to gain the rights for freedoms of people in Saigon while an African American still has to pay a poll tax to vote how can you reconcile the two?
I believe it was this: <span>2.)It reinforced segregation and discrimination. Washington was willing to accept segregation until he got a good enough education that he can become independent.</span>
Answer:As a republic, Rome was ruled by a Senate and various executives. It was governed by two consuls and, later in the life of the republic, one praetor and then later still two. ... Rome became a formal empire when the Senate declared Julius Caesar a dictator without any limit on his term