For a firm that sells a prestige product, the relationship between price and quantity demanded is a <u>positive direct relationship</u>.
<h3>Why is the relationship between demand and price of prestige products direct?</h3>
The relationship between the demand and price of prestige products is direct because prestige products tend to sell better at high prices than at low prices.
And when the quantity demanded increases, the price tends to increase.
An example of a prestige product is an old car.
Thus, for a firm that sells a prestige product, the relationship between price and quantity demanded is a <u>positive direct relationship</u>.
Learn more about the demand for prestige products at brainly.com/question/6374886
Annual Compound Formula is:
A = P( 1 + r/n) ^nt
Where:
A is the future value of the investment
P is the principal investment
r is the annual interest rate
<span>n is the number of
interest compounded per year</span>
t is the number of years the money is invested
So for the given problem:
P = $10,000
r = 0.0396
n = 2 since it is semi-annual
t = 2 years
Solution:
A = P( 1 + r/n) ^nt
A = $10,000 ( 1 + 0.0396/2) ^ (2)(2)
A = $10000 (1.00815834432633616)
A = $10,815.83 is the amount after two years
Answer:
The correct option is E,14
Explanation:
In using the two-day moving average to forecast for the next day sales, the previous two days sales are taken , summed to up and finally averaged(that is divided by 2)
Next day forecast=sum of previous two days sales figures/number of days
sum of previous two days forecast=13+15=28
since the number of the days is 2 ,the 8 is divided by 2,28/2=14
Ultimately the next day forecast sales figure is 14 newspapers
Option A is wrong that is just considering of the two previous day, the same thing applies to option B.
Option C is the sum of previous two days sales without being divided
Answer: No, this was merely Carl's opinion.
Explanation:
Labelling a statement as an opinion generally protects the person who said it from defamation suits however this is not always the case.
If the opinion is based on disclosed and well known facts, the action is free of defamatory or libel charges.
This seems to be the case in this scenario as his column seems to be based on the performances for the year.
Bottomline is, Stella cannot sue Carl for libel as it is his opinion.
Answer:
A. Competitive markets face perfectly elastic demand and marginal revenue, while monopolies face downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue.
Explanation:
In the case when competitive firms and monopolies generated at the level in which the marginal cost is equivalent to marginal revenue keeping the other things constant so the price should be less in the competitive market as compared to the monopoly because in the competitive markets it face perfectly elastic demand but in the monopoly it face the down ward sloping demand curve
Therefore the option a is correct
