If an employee within an employee entity has a relationship with itself, that relationship is known as a: <u>Recursive</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What is recursive relationship?</h3>
Recursive relationships, which reflect the possibility of one firm owning another, are non-identifying relationships between two entities or tables. The parent entity or table and the child entity or table are identical in this kind of relationship. These two varieties of recursive relationships are possible to develop:
Hierarchical Recursive or (single-table recursion). A parent entity or table can have any number of children in this kind of relationship, but a child can only have one parent.
Network Recursive or (double-table recursion. A parent entity or table can have any number of children in this kind of relationship, and a child can have any number of parents.
Learn more about Recursive relationships
brainly.com/question/22903171
#SPJ4
In order to compete with another banks, it can do :
- Offer various benefit to gain more customer's deposit
- Create a specific market share and after only a specific consumer
- Make some goods investments to raise its total capital within its region
Answer:
The annual expected loss is $1,250
Explanation:
The annual expected loss can be calculated by multiplying the probability that a risk will occur in a particular year (ARO) by the expected monetary loss every time a risk occurs, (SLE).
ALE=ARO*SLE
In this case,
ARO = 50%
SLE is $2,000 to $3,000. We consider an average so SLE is $2,500
ALE= $2,500 *50%=$1,250
- Realtime online fund transfer.
- Used for high value transactions.
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for Kyoko to choose Left. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Jacques chooses Right and Kyoko chooses Left.
Explanation:
A dominant strategy is strategy that makes a player better off regardless of the strategy of his opponents in a game.
From the payoff matrix, it can be observed that, when Jacques plays Left, Kyoko will also play Left because 4 > 3. But, when Jacques plays Right, Kyoko will still play Left because 4 > 3. This indicated that Kyoko will always play Left no matter what Jacques plays. As a result, the dominant strategy for Kyoko is Left.
On the other hand, when Kyoko plays Left, Jacques will play Right because 5 > 4. But when Kyoko plays Right, Jacques will play Left because 6 > 5. This shows that Jacques does not have any particular strategy that make him better off. As a result, Jacques does not have a dominant strategy.
Based on the above analysis, we have:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for Kyoko to choose Left. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Jacques chooses Right and Kyoko chooses Left.