Answer:
With respect to the employment-at-will doctrine, this is "An exception based on public policy"
Explanation:
Under the public-policy exception to employment at will, an employee is wrongfully discharged when the termination violates an explicit, well-established public policy of the state. For example, in most states, an employer can't terminate an employee for filing a workers' compensation claim after being injured on the job, or for refusing to engage in illegal activity at the request of an employer.
Public policy may be found in a state constitution, statute, administrative rule, or other state policy. The public-policy exception is the most commonly accepted exception, recognized in the vast majority of states.
Answer:
a. $11,000
b. $2,200
Explanation:
According to the cash basis accounting, the cash is recorded when actual cash is received
But as per the accrual basis of accounting, the revenue is recorded when it is realized or earned whether cash is received or not
So,
a. Cash basis = $11,000
b. Accrual basis
= $11,000 ÷ 10 months × 2 months
= $2,200
Answer:
Marginal benefits and marginal costs.
Explanation:
you've been meaning to fix those rotted boards on your porch for years. finally, last week the deck gave way. No, you will not be able to recover the cost of replacement. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the cost?</h3>
Generally, the cost; In order to get or carry out (something), one must first spend (a certain quantity of money).
In conclusion, You've been looking at the rotten planks on your porch for years and know you need to do something about it. The deck ultimately collapsed last week. The cost of replacement cannot be recouped, unfortunately.
Read more about the cost
brainly.com/question/14094934
#SPJ1
Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
