Answer:
a. natural law for Josh, and legal positivism for Colin.
Explanation:
Natural law is a concept that seeks to ground law in common sense, rationality, equity and pragmatism. It does not propose a description of human affairs through a formalized theory or law; Nor does it seek to reach the level of descriptive social science. Natural law has, as its project, to evaluate human options in order to act reasonably and well in the conception of the individual. Josh is using the concept of natural law when he believes, based on his own common sense conceptions, that it is correct for him to decide how fast he will have to ride his own car.
On the other hand, legal positivism refers to a set of norms formulated and enforced by human beings. These norms represent an order that must be followed even if it seems unfair and incorrect. This can be seen in Colin's argument that Josh must slow down the car because it is exceeding the speed allowed by law.
Answer: Mongolia
The capital of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, lies about 726 miles northwest of Beijing, the capital of China. Ulaanbaatar is the largest city on Mongolia, with a population of over 1.3 million people, almost half of the country's population. It is the country's cultural, industrial and financial heart.
The length of each scarf is 68.4 inches
<h3>Calculations and Parameters</h3>
Recall that
1 ft= 12 inches
39.9 ft= 478.8 inches.
Therefore, each scarf's length would be 39.9/7= 5.7 ft.
Convert 5.7 ft to inches.
5.7 * 12= 68.4 inches
Therefore, we can see that the length of each scarf is 68.4 inches
Read more about length and breadth here:
brainly.com/question/21297672
#SPJ1
Answer:
d. Giving too much influence to the wealthy.
Explanation:
Super PACs are a type of Political Action Committees, and PACs represent pools of campaing contributions and donates that money to the political candidates, in an United States elections. They channel funds for or against a candidate or a legislation.
Super PACs are officially known as independent-expenditure only committees, established in 2012. They engage in an unlimited political spending and are not tied to any political campaign. They can raise money from either individuals or corporations, and there are no legal limits on donation size. In that way, wealthy people can influence the outcome of the elections by spending unlimited amount of money for the support of their desired candidate.
