<span>Population size is closely linked to its rate of change. If the population is below the threshold for the resources available, it will increase in size ... The more distance between the actual size and the threshold, the greater the rate of increase. If the population is above its threshold, it will start to decrease in size. The threshold will be the equilibrium position so it will tend to wave up and down until it gets to the equilibrium. The reason real life populations don't do this is because the resources are changing all the time so the equilibrium is a moving target.</span>
<span>according to the five-factor model of personality, estelle would score: </span><span> high on extraversion and high on neuroticism
on the five-factor model of personality, people are considered as an extrovert if they love interracting with people and became the center of attention (we can see that Estelle is outspoken and lover parties & crowds)
And people will be considered as a neurotic if they're cautious and take everything seriously (which cause Estelle to constantly worry)
</span>
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
According to the case given in the question, the competitive force as seen from the Porter's Five Forces Industry Analysis Structure, is the Supplier's bargaining force.
This competitive force in the industry is the perfect representation of the haggling intensity of purchasers and alludes to the weight providers can put on organizations by raising their costs, bringing down their quality, or lessening the accessibility of their items.
The answer to your question would be D.Having different laws for different races. Hope this helps:)
Adam Smith theories promote individualism in the sense that they state that, when each economic agent (households, business, or public entities) pursue their own interests selfishly, the outcomes generated by their economic activities will optimize the social welfare.
The incentives behind working for the own profit are much higher, and make individuals more productive and more sensitive to mistakes, therefore they are keen on improving their practices constantly. In turn, the incentives of working for the common interest are more vague, and such situations lead to sharp productivity declines. It is more likely that societies with greater productivity are able to produce efficiently enough goods and services to cover the needs of all its citizens. Therefore those societies end up maximizing the social welfare. These are the main arguments which support the invisible hand principle coined by Adam Smith.
