Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer: the marketing costs of reaching loyal customers are typically very high
Explanation:
Brand loyalty is when a customer buys a product repeatedly from thesame company rather than buying a substitute from another company. Despite the efforts of the competitors to life them away, such customers are devoted to the product.
It should be noted that the marketing costs of reaching loyal customers are typically low. They hardly need any source of encouragement or advertisement to convince them to make their purchases.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following image.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. Is an opinion what contains the image. Judge it like it is.
As a result of the record amount of grapes, the equilibrium price decreases while the equilibrium quantity increases. Please find attached the required graph.
<h3>What is the impact of the record amount of grapes?</h3>
If there is a record amount of grapes produced, the amount of wine produced would increase. This is because grapes are an input used in the production of wine.
As a result, the supply of wine would increase. This would lead to a shift to the right of the supply curve for wine. the equilibrium price decreases while the equilibrium quantity increases.
To learn more about supply curves, please check: brainly.com/question/26073189
