Which of the following is a compound event?

The perimeter of a rectangle is represented by the expression LaTeX: 2\left(3x+1\right)+2x2 ( 3 x + 1 ) + 2 x. Which statements

rewona [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter of a rectangle = 2(L+W)

L is the length of the triangle

W is the width

If the perimeter of a rectangle is represented by the expression $2\left(3x+1\right)+2$

In order to know what wat each part represents, we will rewrite the given equation in the form 2(L+W).

Given

$2\left(3x+1\right)+2x$

Perimeter of a rectangle

$2L+2W$

Compare the given function with the perimeter to get L and W

$L = 3x+1 \ and \ W = x$

Hence the following statements explain correctly what each part of the expression represents

- One side of the rectangle measures x (the length)

- One side of the rectangle measures 3x + 1 (the width)

- 2 is the coefficient in each term that represents 2 lengths and 2 widths in a rectangle.

8 0

3 years ago

Jemila has $10, $5, and $1 bills in her piggy bank. Their total value is $63. If she has two more $5 bills than $10 bills, and t

earnstyle [38]

Answer:

She has 3 $10 bills, 5 $5 bills and 8 $1

3 times 10= $30

5 times 5 = $25

8 times 1 = $8

$30 + $25 + $8 = $63

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

For the hypothesis test H0: μ = 10 against H1: μ >10 and variance known, calculate the Pvalue for each of the following test

Basile [38]

Answer:

a) $p_v =P(Z>2.05)=1-P(z$

b) $p_v =P(Z>-1.84)=1-P(z$

c) $p_v =P(Z>0.4)=1-P(z$

Step-by-step explanation:

Some previous concepts

The p-value is the probability of obtaining the observed results of a test, assuming that the null hypothesis is correct.

A z-test for one mean "is a hypothesis test that attempts to make a claim about the population mean(μ)".

The null hypothesis attempts "to show that no variation exists between variables or that a single variable is no different than its mean"

The alternative hypothesis "is the hypothesis used in hypothesis testing that is contrary to the null hypothesis"

Hypothesis

Null hypothesis: $\mu=10$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu >10$

If the random variable is distributed like this: $X \sim N(\mu,\sigma)$

We assume that the variance is known so the correct test to apply here is the z test to compare means, the statistic is given by the following formula:

$z_o=\frac{\bar X -\mu}{\sigma}$

Since we have the values for the statistic already calculated we can calculate the p value using the following formulas:

Part a

$p_v =P(Z>2.05)=1-P(z$

And in order to find the answer using excel we can use the following code:

"=1-NORM.DIST(2.05,0,1,TRUE)"

Part b

$p_v =P(Z>-1.84)=1-P(z$

And in order to find the answer using excel we can use the following code:

"=1-NORM.DIST(-1.84,0,1,TRUE)"

Part c

$p_v =P(Z>0.4)=1-P(z$

And in order to find the answer using excel we can use the following code:

"=1-NORM.DIST(0.4,0,1,TRUE)"

Conclusions

If we use a reference value for the significance, let's say $\alpha=0.05$ . For part a the $p_v$ so then we can reject the null hypothesis at this significance level.

For part b the $p_v>\alpha$ so then we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis at this significance level.

For part c the $p_v>\alpha$ so again we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis at this significance level.

3 0

3 years ago

Write the equation that passes through the following points:<br><br> (5,0) and (−10,−5)

Vikentia [17]

Answer:

The answer is:

$y = \frac{1}{3} x - \frac{5}{3}$

Step-by-step explanation:

❃Incase you forgot what the linear equation formula is ☟

$y = mx + b$

❃Incase you also forgot, The is what the slope formula is ☟

$m = \frac{y_2 - y_1 }{x_2 - x_1}$

➊ First: We are going to be solving for the slope.

$m = \frac{ - 5 - 0}{ - 10 - 5} = \frac{ - 5}{ - 15} = \frac{1}{3}$

➋Second: We find the y-intercept.

$y = mx + b \\ 0 = \frac{1}{3} (5) + b \\ 0 = \frac{5}{3} + b \\ \frac{ - \frac{5}{3} = - \frac{5}{3 } \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: }{ - \frac{5}{3} = b}$

➌Third: Plug in.

$y = \frac{1}{3} x - \frac{5}{3}$

4 0

3 years ago

Every week, Judy goes to the supermarket and buys the following: $5$ carrots at $\$1$ each, $3$ bottles of milk at $\$3$ each, $

Flauer [41]

Answer:

She spends $30 in total.

Step-by-step explanation:

Suppose that you buy X units of a given product with a price Y, then the total cost here is X*Y, with this we can solve our problem:

Every week Judy buys:

5 carrots, at $1 each, so she spends 5*$1 = $5 in carrots.

3 bottles of milk at $3, so she spends 3*$3 = $9 in milk bottles.

2 pineapples at $4 each (but the pineapples are at half price, so this week the pineapples cost $4/2 = $2), so she spends 2*$2 = $4 in pineapples.

2 bags of flour at $5 each, so she spends 2*$5 = $10 in flour.

1 giant container of ice cream, she spends $7 on it.

So the total money that she speends is:

$5 + $9 + $4 + $10 + $7 = $35

And she has a coupon for $5 in any order equal to or larger than $25, his order is larger than $25, so she can use the coupon.

So she will spend a total of $35 - $5 = $30

She spends $30 in total.

3 0

3 years ago