A because you need to know how to write your outline and how you should write your paper
Answer:
Lisa wants to go.
Explanation:
Infinitives are 'to' plus a verb. 'To go quickly' is an infinitival phrase. 'To the room' and 'to the blue room' are prepositional phrases.
Answer:
British philosopher George Berkeley believed in immaterialism, which rejects the existence of physical matter and considers that material objects are only ideas of those who perceive them. In the quotation, he believes that it is impossible to know whether there are things outside the mind. In that matter, he maintains that there exists the same evidence now for thinking that there are things outside the mind, and that same evidence would also exist if there were no things outside the mind.
The classification of the statements is as follows:
1 “Do not believe what our barangay captain says. He is only a high school graduate," Maquie told her neighbors. (d. social class)
2. People who live in Pulang Bato Village, a place where many crimes happen, are bad and dangerous. (a. racial)
- The sentences have been classified based on the form of discrimination being expressed.
- In the first sentence, the doubt on the Barangay captain is attributed to the fact that he was just a high school graduate. This is based on social class.
- Also, in the second sentence, the classification of the people in Pulang Bato Village is based on race.
So, the above are the classifications.
Learn more about discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/1084594
Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
