Perhaps you mean to find the volume under
? It seems like you have to rely on calculus otherwise (in the case that you indeed mean
).
Assuming this, note that
describes the top half of a sphere with radius 8, which means the volume below this surface over the disk
is simply half the volume of the sphere. Thus the volume is
Answer:
c. 6
Step-by-step explanation:
The degree of a vertex is the number of arc ends that intercept it. (The other end of the arc is irrelevant.)
Vertex A is connected to B (1), D (2), F (1), and itself (2). There are a total of 6 arc ends that meet vertex A. Its degree is 6.
No, because (2,0) is a coordinate. x=2 and y=0. So just plug in the numbers where there's x or y with the appropriate number, (2 or 0). So in the first equation, x-2y=0, when you pug in the numbers, 2-2(0)=0, you know it's wrong because 2-0=0 isn't correct. So no. the point (2,0) is not a solution to the first equation. Now plug in the numbers for the second coordinate. You get 2(2)-3(0)=1. So 4-0=1. This is once again false no no. (2,0) satisfies neither equations.
Answer:
His equation is correct but his calculations are incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation:
180-40=140 so y=140
Hope this helps!
Answer: 2014
Step-by-step explanation:
LED: -25x + 6y = 20
CFL: 15x + 2y = 322
we need to find which year it was the same to know where LED lighting surpassed CFL lighting
-25x + 6y = 20
15x + 2y = 322 (-3)
-25x + 6y = 20
<u>-45x - 6y = -966 </u>
-70x = -946
x = 13.51
The nearest year would be 14 which is 2014
