Answer:
Option A, if they were wealthy, is the right answer.
Explanation:
Women in the Roman empire were not given rights as equal to men. They could receive basic education if any, and they were subject to the men's authority. The freedom of a woman was largely depended on the wealth she owned and the social status she had. A few women could run their businesses with their wealth. Such women included lamp-maker, hairdressers, doctors, or midwives etc.
Congress did not support John Quincy Adams's ambitions to advance the arts and sciences. Congress was mostly made up of Democratic-Republicans (Quincy Adams was a Federalist) who believed in small government, so they were not willing to <span>fund what Adams was proposing.</span>
I honestly dont know the answer to this
Answer:
Fiedler's contingency leadership model is determined by this.
Explanation:
Fiedler's Contingency Theory suggests that an individual's efficacy as a leader <em>depends on how his/her leading style goes with the situation. </em>
We can see it in this case; the leadership model is <em>determined by how the leader's style (whichever orientation it has) is effective towards the situation being presented to him/her. </em>
There can be other factors that come into play, such as one's personality, the nature of the task and the group in general.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was controversial because it left the issue of whether slavery should be allowed to a popular vote, which brought about a series of violent confrontations called bleeding Kansas.
