A.) They increased the personal freedoms of enslaved African Americans
People can make their own lawful decisions.
It is a matter of opinion, I suppose.
We need jurors, of course, but with so many people who hate it, there surely wouldn't be enough if the goverment simply allowed whoever wanted to volunteer to be the jury. I suppose that makes it sound like a burden, as it's a goverment-ordered requirement, like taxes. It is a privilege, though, if you think about it. Being selected for jury-duty means that you're a reliable citizen of America and you're trusted enough to help make a very important decision.
So, to restate my initial response, Jury duty can be seen as a duty or a burden, depending on how one views it.
Answer:
A some throwbacks for a direct democracy is explained below in details.
Explanation:
In a direct democracy, characters choose management without any mediator. Depending on the appropriate system in practice, direct democracy might necessitate transient executive resolutions, the application of sortition, composing laws, straight selecting or removing executives, and conducting hearings.
Answer:
Right to freedom of religion: (1) Every person who has faith in religion shall have the freedom to profess, practice and protect his or her religion according to his or her conviction. (2) Every religious denomination shall have the right to operate and protect its religious sites and religious Guthi (trusts).
Explanation:
