Answer:Functional magnetic resonance imaging or functional MRI (fMRI)
Explanation:Functional magnetic resonance imaging or functional MRI (fMRI) is a technique used to measure activities that occurs in the brain by detecting how the blood flow changes. It is based on the fact that blood flow and neuronal activation occur together.
Because the witnesses had different viewpoints so they might have seen different things..
If for example the witness is somehow related to the victim, his/her point of view might have been compromised and couldn't be used
hope this helps
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
They both used Decentralized government
They both distribute their governmental power into several locations, to make sure that they reach each corner of the countries while still maintaining control from the central government
These smaller Authorities can enforce their own decision making, but they still have to follow the guidelines from the central government
Answer:
In a command economy, the government can not establish means that will influence competition between companies.
Explanation:
Command economy is an economic system in which the economy of a given country is directed and supervised solely by the state. In this context, all important decisions and all that generates income not only belong to the government but are controlled by it.
This model of economy differs from the market economy, where the rule of supply and demand prevails, and the control of goods and products is totally given to the government. In this way, the income and resources obtained in production and commerce are equally divided among all. In the planned economy there is no competition, and the only purpose of this system is to promote growth and collective well-being.
Although the focus of this economic model is not based on profits but on the collective good, the planned economy can also offer advantages to companies and organizations that aim to develop their internal processes and resources. By adapting this system to corporate needs, it can foster business growth and development.
