The Indian Ocean trading network fostered the growth of states. ... In key places along important trade routes, merchants set up diasporic communities where they introduced their own cultural traditions into the indigenous cultures and, in turn, indigenous cultures influenced merchant cultures.
There are a lot different answers to this question so what specific things are you looking for?
Answer:
The answer is option D "Pro-choice on the issue of abortion"
Explanation:
Progressivism, in the US, political and social-change development that carried significant changes to American legislative issues and government during the initial twenty years of the twentieth century.
Progressivism reformers put forth the main exhaustive attempt inside the American setting to address the issues that emerged with the development of an advanced metropolitan and modern culture. The U.S. populace almost multiplied somewhere in the range of 1870 and 1900.
Urbanization and movement expanded at quick rates and were joined by a move from nearby limited scope assembling and business to huge scope industrial facility creation and monster public companies. Innovative forward leaps and furious looks for new business sectors and wellsprings of capital caused remarkable financial development.
I don't know you have to study this.
This is not a fair assessment because it is a generalization about the other presidents due to an event that happened a long time ago and that does not involve them.
The Vietnam War was a warlike confrontation that occurred in the territory of Vietnam in which two sides faced each other. On one side were the North Vietnamese who had a Communist ideology, while the South Vietnamese had a Capitalist ideology.
This confrontation involved several foreign countries such as the Soviet Union and the United States. In the case of the United States, many American citizens rejected the idea of involving the country in an alien confrontation because it had not affected American interests.
The president of the United States did not take into account citizen requests not to get involved in this confrontation and lied to be able to get involved in it. From that moment the credibility of the government is lower.
The credibility of the next government was also affected because now citizens believe that the rulers are lying. This conception is wrong and unfair because the management of all the presidents and public servants cannot be generalized due to the wrong action of one of them.
Therefore, I believe that it is not a fair evaluation that is expressed by the war veteran Karl Marlantes because he is generalizing about all the rulers because of what one of them has done.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/11375126?
