Consider the contrapositive of the statement you want to prove.
The contrapositive of the logical statement
<em>p</em> ⇒ <em>q</em>
is
¬<em>q</em> ⇒ ¬<em>p</em>
In this case, the contrapositive claims that
"If there are no scalars <em>α</em> and <em>β</em> such that <em>c</em> = <em>α</em><em>a</em> + <em>β</em><em>b</em>, then <em>a₁b₂</em> - <em>a₂b₁</em> = 0."
The first equation is captured by a system of linear equations,

or in matrix form,

If this system has no solution, then the coefficient matrix on the right side must be singular and its determinant would be

and this is what we wanted to prove. QED
This would be much, much, much easier if you told us
what numbers you do have on each side of the scale now.
The idea (probably) is that the scale is balanced when
the numbers add up to the same amount on both sides.
So you need to put some numbers in the blanks that will either
add more to the side that has less, or subtract some from the side
that has more, to make both sides equal.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
The equations are
● 4x + 2y = 10 (1)
● 4x - 2y = -10 (2)
● 4x + 2y = 10
Add - 4x to both sides
● 4x + 2y -4x = 10 -4x
● 2y = 10 -4x
Divide both sides by 2
● 2y/2 = (10 - 4x)/2
● y = 5 - 2x
● y = -2x + 5 (1)
● 4x - 2y = -10
Add -4x to both sides
● 4x -2y -4x = -10 - 4x
● -2y = -10 - 4x
Divide both sides by -2
● -2y/-2 = (-10 -4x)/-2
● y = 10 + 2x
● y = 2x + 5 (2)
So the equation are
● y = 2x + 5
● y = -2x + 5
Graph them
The lines intersect at (0,5) but aren't perpendicular
So the answer is d
Answer:
Our answer is 0.8172
Step-by-step explanation:
P(doubles on a single roll of pair of dice) =(6/36) =1/6
therefore P(in 3 rolls of pair of dice at least one doubles)=1-P(none of roll shows a double)
=1-(1-1/6)3 =91/216
for 12 players this follows binomial distribution with parameter n=12 and p=91/216
probability that at least 4 of the players will get “doubles” at least once =P(X>=4)
=1-(P(X<=3)
=1-((₁₂ C0)×(91/216)⁰(125/216)¹²+(₁₂ C1)×(91/216)¹(125/216)¹¹+(₁₂ C2)×(91/216)²(125/216)¹⁰+(₁₂ C3)×(91/216)³(125/216)⁹)
=1-0.1828
=0.8172
Answer: D) 
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given table we can see that this is not representing a linear function as the rate of change is not constant.
So it can be exponential growth function
, where A is the initial amount , b is the multiplicative rate of growth and n is the time period in weeks.
Now here at n=1 , f(n)=8
Therefore, A=8
Now, for n=2

By substitute the values of A and b in the above equation, we get the equation 
Therefore, the function best shows the relationship between n and f(n) is
, where n is the number of weeks.