Answer:
Misappropriation refers to the use of another person's intellectual property including their name or likeness without prior permission from the person which can then cause harm to that person.
This is indeed an example of misappropriation because the company tried to use Bette's likeness in the commercial. After being rebuffed by Bette saying that she does not do commercials for whatever business or personal reasons known to her, they still sought to use her popularity and image to make their products more popular.
To do so they hired a backup singer and told her to sing as much like Bette as she could so much so that even Bette's close acquaintances thought that it was Bette. If her close acquaintances could think it was her, imagine the general public.
They therefore made it seem as though Bette did their commercial which then would mean that Bette does in fact do commercials which would do damage her assertion that she does not do same. This would bring harm to her business relationships if for instance she had rebuffed other companies in the past when they sought her to do their commercials.
This is a case of Misappropriation and Bette should sue.
Answer: Chen has 90 days after he receives his "right-to-sue"letter from the EEOC to sue his employer in federal court
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) investigated Chen's complaint of workplace discrimination against his employer and sent him a notice stating that it found no reasonable cause for his complaint.
Chen's next step if he wants to pursue the claim is that Chen has 90 days after he receives his "right-to-sue"letter from the EEOC to sue his employer in federal court.
Price elasticity of demand, is the degree to which the effective desire for something changes as its price changes. In general, people desire things less as those things become more expensive
