Answer:
% change decrease is = 1.2 %
Explanation:
given data
assets = $100 million
average duration = 3 years
liabilities = $90 million
average duration = 3 years
interest rates= 4% increase
to find out
percentage decrease in First National Bank's net worth relative to the total original asset value
solution
change in assets value is
change in assets value = $100 million × 4% × 3 year = $1200 million
change in liability value is
change in assets value = $90 million × 4% × 3 year = $1080 million
change in net worth = $1200 - $1080 = $120 million
so % change is = 
% change decrease is = 1.2 %
The answer is $76.54 Let us use 3 months as our period. Thus, we restate the annual required rate of9.25% as a quarterly (or three-month) rate of = 2.3125% (or 0.023125). Applying the constant dividend model with infinite horizon and with the quarterly rate of return and a quarterly dividend of $1.77, we get: = $76.54<span>.
Price of Preferred Stock = Dividend / required return of rate - growth rate</span>
Answer:
<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.
On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.
No, they can be used for mechanical uses
Well I’m young so I make money through part time jobs such as chick fila or some other restaurant that pays
