Answer:
The scientist’s conclusion is not appropriate because it is based on a subjective appreciation (“significantly greater than”).
<em>How “greater” is “significantly greater”?
</em>
A more objective and technical approach would be fixing a level of significance, let's say 0.05 or 0.01 for example, measuring the samples means and standard deviations and then proceeding with an appropriate hypothesis testing in order to see if the differences in means are really significant.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
51/200.
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
x=-3.33
Step-by-step explanation:
-5=15x
x=-5/15
x=-3.33
For this case, since the variation is direct then we have a relation of the form:
![y = kx](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20y%20%3D%20kx%20%20)
Where,
k: proportionality constant
To find k we substitute the following data:
y = 16 when x = 8
We have then:
![16 = k8](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%2016%20%3D%20k8%20%20)
Clearing the value of k we have:
![k = \frac{16}{8}\\k = 2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20k%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B16%7D%7B8%7D%5C%5Ck%20%3D%202%20%20%20)
Then, the equation is:
![y = 2x](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20y%20%3D%202x%20%20)
Substituting the value of x = 16 we have:
![y = 2 (16)\\y = 32](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20y%20%3D%202%20%2816%29%5C%5Cy%20%3D%2032%20%20)
Answer:
The value of y for x = 16 is:
![y = 32](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20y%20%3D%2032%20)
Answer:
I'm really not sure sorry
Step-by-step explanation:
but copy and paste the question and you will find the answer