The author of Source 3 counters the argument regarding giant pandas by stating that they're beneficial to the ecosystem.
<h3>What is an argument?</h3>
It should be noted that an argument simply means the stance of an individual regarding an issue.
In this case, the author of Source 3 most clearly counter the argument in Source 1 that protecting giant pandas isn't appropriate by stating that they play an important role in the ecosystem.
Learn more about arguments on:
brainly.com/question/3775579
According to Brent Ashabranner in his introduction to <em>Always to Remember</em>, Jan Craig Scruggs, a Vietnam veteran born in 1950, had the idea that Vietnam veterans like himself deserved a memorial.
Veterans of other wars were honored, but since the Vietnam War was opposed by many people, Vietnam veterans were not honored in such a way. Jan Scruggs, however, believed that the 58 thousand servicemen and women killed in the war deserved to be honored with a memorial, and so he created a fund to carry out his idea.
Answer:“The windows were ajar and gleaming white against the fresh grass outside that seemed to grow a little way into the house. A breeze blew through the room, blew curtains in at one end and out the other like pale flags, twisting them up toward the frosted wedding-cake of the ceiling, and then rippled over the wine-colored rug, making a shadow on it as wind does on the sea. The only completely stationary object in the room was an enormous couch on which two young women were buoyed up as though upon an anchored balloon. They were both in white, and their dresses were rippling and fluttering as if they had just been blown back in after a short flight around the house.”
Explanation: :P
Answer:
D.H.C's position is ironic because he describes his actions as "indecorous", meaning not improper, yet he describes his intimate relationship with a woman from the reservation as unemotionally connected and short lived which is the opposite of healthy and normal.
