I’m not sure about the first one (my best guess is B.) but the second one is A.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the missing amount is as follows:
As we know that
The total manufacturing cost = Direct Materials Used + Direct Labor Used + Factory Overhead
So,
(1)
= $42,700 + $64,200 + $52500
= $159,400
(2)
= $298,000 - $78,100 - $144,000
= $75,900
(3)
= $314,000 - $57,400 - $113,000
= $143,600
Answer:
A). Dependent demand is directly related to the demand of other stock-keeping units (SKUs) and can be calculated without needing to be forecasted.
Explanation:
The first statement asserts a true claim as it correctly states that 'dependent demand is promptly associated to the demand of further SKUs and therefore, it can be measured without requiring any prediction.' Dependent demand is characterized as a demand that is reliant on the other products' demand. This is why such demands are directly influenced by a rise or fall in the other products' demand and <u>this is the reason due to which dependent demand can be calculated easily without any prediction because it will observe a similar impact as its associated product would face</u>. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
false: it means you dont have to agree with them but you have to respect their opinion
Answer:
The use of data aggregation leads to overstatement of the concentration and Herfindahl indices
while the use of National/state data leads to understatement of the degree of concentration in local markets.
Explanation:
The ratio of concentration and Herfindahl indices computed are mainly made up of foreign players while the contributions of small local unorganized players are not considered, which leads to the increase in the value of indices and ratios been used, ( i.e. The use of data aggregation ) . hence the overstatement of the actual level.
The understatement of the degree of concentration in local markets happens because of the use of national and state data while computing the concentration in the local markets like gasoline and this is mainly caused by the presence of fewer industries in the market. The state and national data does not reflect the true concentration in the local market hence the degree of concentration is understated at the local level.
