Answer:
b) synergy
Explanation:
Synergy -
It describes the benefit gain by strategically organizing itself to maximize innovation and cooperation .
These organization with synergic approach achieves more as a group than with individual .
hence , in the question , the approach shown by the Ortein company is an example of b) synergy .
Answer:
D) $40,000
Explanation:
The Joneses qualify for a Section 121 exemption since they lived at their house for 20 years. They are exempted from paying capital gains taxes on the first $500,000 ($250,000 if single) in realized gains from selling their home.
Joneses taxable gain = $750,000 (sales price) - $210,000 (basis) - $500,000 (section 121) = $40,000
They will have to recognize only $40,000 in gains.
Answer: $20,000
Explanation:
Bonds are to be carried in the books at their fair value which is their market value. That value is $20,000 in this instance and so Dyckman Dealers will have to record the bonds at that $20,000 value.
Investment analysis are not a basis for recording bond prices. They are simply a basis for making investment decisions. For instance, because they believe that the bond is overvalued, they can benefit from this by short selling the bond and waiting for it to drop in price.
Answer:
The balance in the account = $851.8
Explanation:
The future value of a lump sum is the amount expected at a future date when a sum of money is invested today at a particular rate of interest for certain number of years
.
This implies compounding the initial amount invested ($300) at the given interest rate(11%) for 10 years.This will be done as follows:
<em />
FV = PV × (1+r)^(n)
FV-Future value
r- rate of return per period
n- Number of period
PV - 300
r-11%
DATA
FV- ?
PV - 300
n- 10
FV= 300 × 1.11^10 = 851.83
The balance in the account = $851.8
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Yes South Carolina would be compensating David as his property is now economically valueless.
Explanation:
Under the taking clause, 'The Beachfront Management Act was properly and validly designed to preserve South Carolina's beaches', which means that no one will be allowed to do any development project near beaches in order to save the beaches.
Though it is already written in the Act, The Beachfront Management Act barred any further development on the coasts of Carolina, which makes the purchased property of David as economically valuless, so South Carolina would be compensating him as the law has passed and they won't allow further development but they need to compensate the people who purchased the property on the beaches for the purpose of future business.
