The yield to maturity on the bonds is 10.0868%
<u>Explanation</u>:
Given,
Annual coupon rate = 8% = 0.08
Par value = $ 1000
Price = $ 865
N = 11 
1 .
PV = $ 865
PMT = ( Par Value The coupon rate) / F
= ( 1000 0.08 ) / 1
= 80.
FV = 1000.
Financial calculator solution
the yield to maturity = I = 0.1008668
= 10.0868% .
<span>(7C3 * 73C0) / 80C3
but that = (35 * 1) / 80C3
= 35 / 82160
= .00043
For B
</span><span>(7C1 * 73C2 + 7C2 * 73C1 + 7C3 * 73C0) / 80C3
= 19964 / 82160 = .243
</span>hope it helps
Answer:
B) The promise to pay in the event of a covered claim
Explanation:
The promise to pay in the happening of a covered claim apparently describes the promise to pay in the process of covered claim. In insurance matter of contracts, the insurer assures to pay for covered losses which the insured suffers and the insured promises to do what the contract says and pay the premium. Most non insurance contracts are fluctuating contracts. The amount of attention given by both parties are almost equivalent.
Answer:
A party wall
Explanation:
A party wall
A Party wall which sometimes also called a parting wall is referred to that wall which is used or shared by both property owners. The purpose of this wall is to separate the two adjoining owners, therefore, thickness varies from 9 to 12 inches. Party wall agreement need to signed between both sharing owners to make any repair work on the party wall.
Answer:
The income effect and substitution effect work in opposite directions and income effect is dominant.
Explanation:
In case of a normal good, both the income effect as well as substitution effect work in the same direction. A fall in the price of a product will increase the purchasing power of the consumer so its quantity demanded will increase.
The consumers will also prefer the cheaper good so the substitution effect will cause the quantity demanded to increase.
In case of an inferior good, however, income elasticity is negative. The income effect and substitution effect work in opposite directions.
A price decrease in the case of an inferior good will increase the real income and purchasing power of the consumer. This will cause the quantity demanded of the inferior good to decline as the consumer will prefer a substitute normal good.
