1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anzhelika [568]
1 year ago
5

In the house of representatives what is the next step in the legislative process immediately after a debate is scheduled

Law
1 answer:
sp2606 [1]1 year ago
4 0

The Rules Committee decides whether the debate can go a place, hence the correct response is C.

<h3>What is the house of Representatives?</h3>

Each state is guaranteed at least one representative in the House of Representatives, which is a part of the legislative branch of the federal government and shares equal legislative authority with the U.S. Senate (the other part of the legislative branch).

The complete question is :

In the House of Representatives, what is the next step in the legislative process immediately after a debate is scheduled?

A. All present members of the House vote on the proposed bill.

B. The Speaker of the House allows members to speak about the proposed bill.

C. The Rules Committee decides whether the debate can take place.

D. The Committee of the Whole debates and revises the proposed bill.

When a bill is introduced in the House (a bill can only be introduced by a member of the House known as a sponsor), it is referred to a committee. If the committee votes in favor of scheduling the measure, the Rules Committee will carefully review the bill and offer a recommendation.

Thus, option C is the correct answer.

Learn more about the House of representatives:

brainly.com/question/747415

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Your perception time is always the same.<br> A. TRUE<br> B. FALSE
Anastasy [175]
Your answer is false .
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly?
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

The (B) Sherman Antitrust Act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly.

  • This act made this illegal and you could be arrested.
  • The main purpose of this act was to conserve competition is business.

I hope this helped at all.

6 0
2 years ago
What potential conflict of interest is presented by a lawmaker accepting an
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary.

In certain relationships, individuals or the general public place their trust and confidence in someone to act in their best interests. When an individual has the responsibility to represent another person—whether as administrator, attorney, executor, government official, or trustee—a clash between professional obligations and personal interests arises if the individual tries to perform that duty while at the same time trying to achieve personal gain. The appearance of a conflict of interest is present if there is a potential for the personal interests of an individual to clash with fiduciary duties, such as when a client has his or her attorney commence an action against a company in which the attorney is the majority stockholder.

Incompatibility of professional duties and personal interests has led Congress and many state legislatures to enact statutes defining conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest and specifying the sanctions for violations. A member of a profession who has been involved in a conflict of interest might be subject to disciplinary proceedings before the body that granted permission to practice that profession.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the correct answer
MrMuchimi
I believe its D. If i’m wrong, you can let me know and i’ll try again.
7 0
3 years ago
Explain why it is sometimes nessessery to limit rights
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

It is necessary to limit individual rights because the fundamental rights are good but giving extra rights makes a person feel distinguished from the society and establish their supremacy.

In a democracy, the rights that are being written in the constitution of different countries is necessary but on the other hand, granting extra rights to the citizens can destroy democracy and establish a sense of helplessness.

That's it you need to know!

Hope it helps you mate!

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a presentence report?​
    6·1 answer
  • What do profilers use to create the profile? *
    13·1 answer
  • When dealing with Drug Evidence, which response below is not an appropriate precaution?
    14·1 answer
  • True or False? It is illegal to call a pickle, a pickle if it doesn't bounce in CT?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a good way to fit into the crowd if you decide to go to a party and not drink?
    7·1 answer
  • What can robots do that humans cannot do?
    6·2 answers
  • The founders of the United States trusted in the impartial wisdom of citizens to check the power of all three branches of govern
    14·1 answer
  • License fees are imposed in the exercise of police power. <br> True or False
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following types of physical evidence might disqualify a suspect as the culprit?
    11·2 answers
  • Analyze the impact of gender based violence on individual or community​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!