Yes,yes he would most definetly.
Answer:
Glorious Revolution
To gain a Protestant ruler
The Glorious Revolution was a revolt against the English King, King James II, in the years 1688 and 1689. King James II was a Catholic and this worried most of his Government and people especially when he started granting Catholics greater statuses. They therefore sought to remove him and after they did explicitly forbade the Monarchy from ever being Catholic.
To support a constitutional monarchy
The public mood during the time was that of a monarchy with some checks on its power from Parliament. King James did not seem to want this and dissolved Parliament in 1687 in order to instill a more subservient Parliament.
To protect Parliament's power.
Another reason for the revolt was a desire to protect the powers of Parliament which King James sought to remove. After the revolt ended, Parliament gained more power than it ever had under the reign of William of Orange and Mary (King James's daughter).
American Revolution
To win independence from Britain
The American Revolution occurred in the years 1775 to 1783 and was primarily done by the Colonies in what is now the USA to free themselves from the rule of Britain. This was done as a result of what was seen as unfair Taxation, Economical and other policies imposed on the Colonies by the British.
To create a Republican Government
Another aim of the Revolution was to have a democratic Government that was elected by the people to serve the people not a Monarch in a country thousands of miles away.
Explanation: trust
One factor is the views that you have. If you share the same views for the future with the PAC group then there's higher likeness that you will get their donations. One factor also is belonging in a committee that decides on legislature or something similar. If the PAC group wants some law to be passed, they'll support that committee that's in charge of it.
<span>The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act - Title 28, 1330, 1332, 1391(f), 1441(d), and 1602 1611 of the United States Code places limits on suing foreign sovereign nations in State or Federal courts.
The law should not include exceptions for state-sponsored terrorism.
These offences are direct attacks against a nation and are covered within context of any other attack on the nation or its people.</span>
