Process of Elimination could help...
A. It doesn't exactly say that they were horrified by the use of the book. But it does say remarkably they were allowed in to see it. This could mean that something was being done with the book that the Dutch may not like.
B. It doesn't say that they are proud of the way they are using the book and the evidence from the text actually refutes that. If they were proud wouldn't they let everyone in to see the way they were using the book? Obviously they aren't proud if they are attempting to hide the way it's being used.
C. It doesn't say this either. And the way the book is treated would not deeply hurt the Americans as much as the Dutch. Plus they aren't allowed in to see it.
D. They are only letting in the dutch as it says from the text.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
The answer is<em> Unless the oppressed fight back with violence, the oppressor will triumph.</em>
Explanation:
This is a famous quotation by Martin Luther King Jr. He strongly believed that non-cooperation with the evil is as just as moral obligation as cooperation with the good, what this means is that the oppressed must not be passive, but to actively fight for their freedom and rights, never letting the oppressor a moment of peace.
I believe this is the first amendment. "Congress shall make no law prohibiting... or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press..."
Answer: D. Is technology limiting our ability to have real communication with one another?
If a student decided to study the effects of technology on society, this question would be a good starting point. The fact that people are not communicating enough with one another could have enormous implications for society. For example, people might end up in more disagreements because of it. Different groups in society might never talk to each other, which means they might be fearful or suspicious of each other. Finally, cooperation and collaboration would be harder to achieve and maintain.
