Answer: 6x - 3 over x^3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
see below
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation for half life is
n = no e ^ (-kt)
Where no is the initial amount of a substance , k is the constant of decay and t is the time
no = 9.8
1/2 of that amount is 4.9 so n = 4.9 and t = 100 years
4.9 = 9.8 e^ (-k 100)
Divide each side by 9.8
1/2 = e ^ -100k
Take the natural log of each side
ln(1/2) = ln(e^(-100k))
ln(1/2) = -100k
Divide each side by -100
-ln(.5)/100 = k
Our equation in years is
n = 9.8 e ^ (ln.5)/100 t)
Approximating ln(.5)/100 =-.006931472
n = 9.8 e^(-.006931472 t) when t is in years
Now changing to days
100 years = 100*365 days/year
36500 days
Substituting this in for t
4.9 = 9.8 e^ (-k 36500)
Take the natural log of each side
ln(1/2) = ln(e^(-36500k))
ln(1/2) = -36500k
Divide each side by -100
-ln(.5)/36500 = k
Our equation in years is
n = 9.8 e ^ (ln.5)/36500 d)
Approximating ln(.5)/365=-.00001899
n = 9.8 e^(-.00001899 d) when d is in days
The solution is shown in the photo
Answer:
1:q 2: q+4
Step-by-step explanation:
I took the test got a 100
Answer:
The test is left - tailed
We cannot reject the organization's claim ( its cheapest screens will truly last less than 2.8 years)
Step-by-step explanation:
Sample size, n = 61
Sample mean, 
Standard deviation, 
Significance level, α=0.02
Null hypothesis, 
Alternative hypothesis, 
It is clearly seen from the alternative hypothesis, that it is a left tailed test. It is not tailed towards the two directions.
Calculate the test statistic:
Calculate the P-value:
P(Z < -3.35) = 0.0002
Since (p-value = 0.0002) < (α=0.02), the null hypothesis is rejected.
It can therefore be concluded that the mean of the cheapest screen is less than 2.8 years. i.e. the cheapest screen will last less than 2.8 years
