Hello,
According to what I have read, this has been happening because every United States state is also a sovereign and independent entity in its own right and is granted the power to create and apply laws, and regulate them according to their needs. In addition, some laws, such as certain voting laws and criminal laws and statutes, tend to be somewhat uniform across states; nevertheless, some areas of law can be very, very different from one state to the next.
Answer:
They selected the beach at Kitty Hawk as their proving ground because of the constant wind that added lift to their craft. In 1902 they came to the beach with their glider and made more than 700 successful flights.
Answer:
The answer is c) The ability to automatize driving and dedicate the majority of your attention to the conversation.
Explanation:
Being able to drive a car while you carry on a conversation with a friend in the passenger seat is explained by your ability to concentrate on driving and the people or vehicles around the environment, and also block out all forms of distraction, but still dedicate majority of your attention to the conversation.
Answer:
The possible answers are:
A
. Yes, because his actions constituted an unlawful operation of the construction equipment.
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
C. No, because at most he could be found guilty of criminal negligence.
D. No, because he must have been aware that his conduct would cause the damage to the trailer in order to be found guilty of reckless damage.
The correct answer is:
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
Explanation:
The worker should be found guilty, since he was aware of being intoxicated from the beginning of the action, knowing in advance that when operating the heavy construction equipment there would be a great threat for the people and properties around. Besides, he was also aware about the alarming signs, due to the fact that he could not reach the dum truck normally, he had to jump the fence to reach it, increasing the risk with his actions.
Answer:
Content validity
Explanation:
Content validity refers to the fact that a study actually measures all aspects of the construct.
For a study to be valid, <u>the measurement method must cover all relevant parts of the subject it is measuring</u>. If it doesn't do so, then the validity of the study is treatment because of content validity.
In this case, the construct we are studying (quality of a relationship) has three parts (belong, interdependence and intimacy). Since <u>the questionnaire doesn't include items tapping intimacy it is not covering all three parts of the construct</u> and therefore it is lacking content validity.
