Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
She doubts that she could ever give up drinking Diet Coke. Judy is demonstrating <u>"psychological dependence.
"</u>
The term psychology is for the most part intended to allude to behavioral procedures that identify with the feelings or the psyche. The term psychological dependence is for the most part intended to depict the enthusiastic and mental procedures that are related with the improvement of, and recuperation from, a substance utilize turmoil or process compulsion. Be that as it may, there can be no aggregate partition of feeling and discernment from physiology.
Most people or references that allude to psychological dependence are referring to the subjective and passionate parts of addictive practices or the withdrawal procedure from medications or liquor rather than endeavoring to order certain substances or exercises as being mentally addictive or physically addictive.
Answer:
<u>A</u> 1. The Supreme Court established the __________________ test to create a standard for speech and what is or is not protected especially in times of war.
<u>A. Clear and Present Danger</u>
B. Direct Incitement
C. Both are correct
<u>A</u> 2. By way of a Supreme Court decision, which of the following is unconstitutional in public schools?
<u>A.Guns</u>
B.Prayer
C.all forms of speech
D.All of the answers are correct
<u>T</u> 3. How society looks at a respective civil liberty can culturally or ideologically give that liberty greater weight but in terms of the legality or even constitutionality, no one civil liberty is more legal/more important than the others. <u>TRUE</u> or FALSE
Explanation:
1. "The Supreme Court established the clear and present danger test as the predominant standard for determining when speech is protected by the First Amendment."
2. You are not permitted to bring any form of a weapon on school property.
3. This statement clearly describes the Civil Liberty law. Besides, everyone is equal, as it states in the last part of the statement; " no one civil liberty is more legal/more important than the others."
I believe the answer is: <span>approximately half of eligible voters are likely to vote.
The political participation in united states is considered to be pretty low (only 55% of eligible voters use their rights)
From those 55%, the vast majority of them are people who are 40 years old or older, so we can say that American political representatives do not fully represent every segment of united states population</span>
